Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1351-1354 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39583.709074.BE (published 23 May 2008)
Wilbert B van den Hout, health economist1, Wilco C Peul, neurosurgeon2,3, Bart W Koes, professor of general practice4, Ronald Brand, statistician5, Job Kievit, professor1, Ralph T W M Thomeer, neurosurgeon2, for the Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group
1 Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC Leiden, Netherlands, 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, the Hague, Netherlands, 4 Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands, 5 Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center
Correspondence to: W B van den Hout hout{at}lumc.nl
Objective To determine whether the faster recovery after early surgery for sciatica compared with prolonged conservative care is attained at reasonable costs.
Design Cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial.
Setting Nine Dutch hospitals.
Participants 283 patients with sciatica for 6-12 weeks, caused by lumbar disc herniation.
Interventions Six months of prolonged conservative care compared with early surgery.
Main outcome measures Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at one year and societal costs, estimated from patient reported utilities (UK and US EuroQol, SF-6D, and visual analogue scale) and diaries on costs (healthcare, patients costs, and productivity).
Results Compared with prolonged conservative care, early surgery provided faster recovery, with a gain in QALYs according to the UK EuroQol of 0.044 (95% confidence interval 0.005 to 0.083), the US EuroQol of 0.032 (0.005 to 0.059), the SF-6D of 0.024 (0.003 to 0.046), and the visual analogue scale of 0.032 (–0.003 to 0.066). From the healthcare perspective, early surgery resulted in higher costs (difference
1819 (£1449; $2832), 95% confidence interval
842 to
2790), with a cost utility ratio per QALY of
41 000 (
14 000 to
430 000). From the societal perspective, savings on productivity costs led to a negligible total difference in cost (
–12,
–4029 to
4006).
Conclusions Faster recovery from sciatica makes early surgery likely to be cost effective compared with prolonged conservative care. The estimated difference in healthcare costs was acceptable and was compensated for by the difference in absenteeism from work. For a willingness to pay of
40 000 or more per QALY, early surgery need not be withheld for economic reasons.
Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 26872154.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses