BMJ  2008;336:1290-1295 (7 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.a114 (published 29 May 2008)

Research

Patients’ attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study

¹ Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London N19 5LW, ² RaFT Consulting, Clitheroe, Lancashire BB7 4BN

Objective To document the views of patients and the public towards the summary care record (SCR, a centrally stored medical record drawn from the general practice record) and HealthSpace (a personal health organiser accessible through the internet from which people can view their SCR), with a particular focus on those with low health literacy, potentially stigmatising conditions, or difficulties accessing health care.

Design 103 semistructured individual interviews and seven focus groups.

Setting Three early adopter primary care trusts in England where the SCR and HealthSpace are being piloted. All were in areas of relative socioeconomic deprivation.

Participants Individual participants were recruited from general practice surgeries, walk-in centres, out of hours centres, and accident and emergency departments. Participants in focus groups were recruited through voluntary sector organisations; they comprised advocates of vulnerable groups and advocates of people who speak limited English; people with HIV; users of mental health services; young adults; elderly people; and participants of a drug rehabilitation programme.

Methods Participants were asked if they had received information about the SCR and HealthSpace and about their views on shared electronic records in different circumstances.

Results Most people were not aware of the SCR or HealthSpace and did not recall receiving information about it. They saw both benefits and drawbacks to having an SCR and described a process of weighing the former against the latter when making their personal choice. Key factors influencing this choice included the nature of any illness (especially whether it was likely to lead to emergency care needs); past and present experience of healthcare and government surveillance; the person’s level of engagement and health literacy; and their trust and confidence in the primary healthcare team and the wider NHS. Overall, people with stigmatising illness were more positive about the SCR than people who claimed to speak for "vulnerable groups." Misconceptions about the SCR were common, especially confusion about what data it contained and who would have access to it. Most people were not interested in recording their medical data or accessing their SCR via HealthSpace, but some saw the potential for this new technology to support self management and lay care for those with chronic illness.

Conclusion Despite an extensive information programme in early adopter sites, the public remains unclear about current policy on shared electronic records, though most people view these as a positive development. The "implied consent" model for creating and accessing a person’s SCR should be revisited, perhaps in favour of "consent to view" at the point of access.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

In brief
BMJ 2009 339: b2757. [Extract] [Full Text]

Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory

Trisha Greenhalgh, Katja Stramer, Tanja Bratan, Emma Byrne, Yara Mohammad, and Jill Russell
BMJ 2008 337: a1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Let’s put worry about computer security into perspective

J E F Fitzgerald, A Nikkar-Esfahani, A A B Jamjoom, K K Shah, and A G Acheson
BMJ 2008 336: 1452-1453. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

GP computerised summaries may not be accurate or complete

Pamela J F Smith
BMJ 2008 336: 1453. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The NHS programme for information technology

Justin Keen
BMJ 2006 333: 3-4. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: issues of data protection and consent

Trina Adams, Martin Budden, Chris Hoare, and Hugh Sanderson
BMJ 2004 328: 871-874. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Greenhalgh, T., Stramer, K., Bratan, T., Byrne, E., Mohammad, Y., Russell, J. (2008). Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. BMJ 337: a1786-a1786 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Smith, P. J F (2008). GP computerised summaries may not be accurate or complete. BMJ 336: 1453-1453 [Full text]  
• Fitzgerald, J E F, Nikkar-Esfahani, A, Jamjoom, A A B, Shah, K K, Acheson, A G (2008). Let's put worry about computer security into perspective. BMJ 336: 1452-1453 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

GP computerised medical summaries may not be accurate or complete.

Pamela J F Smith
bmj.com, 10 Jun 2008 [Full text]

Patients’ attitudes to the summary care record: Security concerns must be put in context

J.E.F. Fitzgerald, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Jun 2008 [Full text]

Augmenting Patient Records or Augmenting Patient Health?

Bruce Currey
bmj.com, 23 Jun 2008 [Full text]

Primary / Secondary Care Information sharing improves specialist care: the need for us to stay at the cutting edge

Adrian H Heald, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Dec 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>