BMJ  2008;336:1281-1283 (7 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39569.510521.AD

Analysis

Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation

Alan Shiell, professor1, Penelope Hawe, professor1, Lisa Gold, senior research fellow2

1 Population Health Intervention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 4N1, Canada , 2 Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to: A Shiell ashiell@ucalgary.ca

Although guidelines exist for evaluating complex interventions, they may be of little help in dealing with the multiple effects of interventions in complex systems such as hospitals. Alan Shiell, Penelope Hawe, and Lisa Gold explain why it is important to distinguish the two types of complexity

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Health researchers commonly use the notion of complexity to indicate the problems faced in evaluating the effectiveness of many non-drug interventions.1 2 3 However, although it is rarely delineated, complexity has two meanings. In the first it is a property of the intervention, and in the second it is a property of the system in which the intervention is implemented. We examine the implications of these two views for economic evaluation.

The first view of complexity, in effect, means complicated. This is the meaning used in the Medical Research Council’s framework for the evaluation of complex interventions.4 5 A complex intervention is "built up from a number of components, which may act both independently and inter-dependently."4 This makes it hard to define the "active ingredients" and to be sure which component or combinations of components is more important.

The second view makes reference to the insights offered by complexity science.6 7 8 9 Complexity is a . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wade, D. (2009). Control in rehabilitation research. Clin Rehabil 23: 675-680  
  • Clark, A. M., Savard, L. A., Thompson, D. R. (2009). What is the strength of evidence for heart failure disease-management programs?. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 397-401 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cheyne, H., Hundley, V., Dowding, D., Bland, J M., McNamee, P., Greer, I., Styles, M., Barnett, C. A, Scotland, G., Niven, C. (2008). Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 337: a2396-a2396 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Anderson, R. (2008). New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions. BMJ 337: a1937-a1937 [Full text]  
  • Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 337: a1655-a1655 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Measuring and reporting the process of inpatient care
Peter H Millard, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jun 2008 [Full text]
Dynamic vs static aspects of nonlinearities
John Urquhart, MD
bmj.com, 10 Jun 2008 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ