Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1231-1234 (31 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39546.573067.25 (published 1 May 2008)
Michelle E Kruijshaar, senior scientist1, John M Watson, director1, Francis Drobniewski, director and consultant medical microbiologist2, Charlotte Anderson, scientist1, Timothy J Brown, clinical scientist2, John G Magee, director3, E Grace Smith, director4, Alistair Story, tuberculosis nurse specialist1, Ibrahim Abubakar, consultant epidemiologist and head of tuberculosis section1,5
1 Respiratory Diseases Department, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, London NW9 5EQ, 2 Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Barts and the London, Queen Marys School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 2AT, 3 Regional Centre for Mycobacteriology, Health Protection Agency North East, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, 4 Regional Centre for Mycobacteriology, Health Protection Agency, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, 5 School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ
Correspondence to: M E Kruijshaar michelle.kruijshaar{at}hpa.org.uk
Design Cohort of tuberculosis cases reported to the enhanced tuberculosis surveillance system matched to data on drug susceptibility and national strain typing data.
Setting England, Wales, and Northern Ireland 1998-2005.
Main outcome measures Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for drug resistance and associated factors. Proportion of multidrug resistant tuberculosis cases clustered.
Results 28 620 culture confirmed cases were available for analysis. The proportion of cases resistant to isoniazid increased from 5% to 7%. Rifampicin resistance increased from 1.0% to 1.2% and multidrug resistance from 0.8% to 0.9%. Ethambutol and pyrazinamide resistance remained stable at around 0.4% and 0.6%, respectively. Regression analyses showed a significant increase in isoniazid resistance outside London (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.07, a year, associated with changes in age (0.98, 0.98 to 0.99, a year), place of birth (1.49, 1.16 to 1.92), and ethnicity (P<0.05). In London, the rise (1.05, 1.02 to 1.08, a year) was related mainly to an ongoing outbreak. Increases in rifampicin resistance (1.06, 1.01 to 1.11, a year) and multidrug resistance (1.06, 1.00 to 1.12, a year) were small. A fifth of patients with multidrug resistant tuberculosis in 2004-5 had indistinguishable strain types, and one case was identified as extensively drug resistant.
Conclusions The rise in isoniazid resistance reflects increasing numbers of patients from sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian subcontinent, who might have acquired resistance abroad, and inadequate control of transmission in London. The observed increases highlight the need for early case detection, rapid testing of susceptibility to drugs, and improved treatment completion.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses