BMJ  2008;336:1177-1180 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39526.674873.BE (published 17 April 2008)

Research

Cost effectiveness of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: economic evaluation of data from the DiGEM trial

Judit Simon, senior researcher1, Alastair Gray, professor1, Philip Clarke, senior international research fellow2, Alisha Wade, resident3, Andrew Neil, professor4, Andrew Farmer, lecturer5, on behalf of the Diabetes Glycaemic Education and Monitoring Trial Group

1 Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, 2 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia, 3 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, 4 Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, 5 Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford

Correspondence to: J Simon judit.simon{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Objective To assess the cost effectiveness of self monitoring of blood glucose alone or with additional training in incorporating the results into self care, in addition to standardised usual care for patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes.

Design Incremental cost utility analysis from a healthcare perspective. Data on resource use from the randomised controlled diabetes glycaemic education and monitoring (DiGEM) trial covered 12 months before baseline and 12 months of trial follow-up. Quality of life was measured at baseline and 12 months using the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire.

Setting Primary care in the United Kingdom.

Participants 453 patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes.

Interventions Standardised usual care (control) compared with additional self monitoring of blood glucose alone (less intensive self monitoring) or with training in self interpretation of the results (more intensive self monitoring).

Main outcome measures Quality adjusted life years and healthcare costs (sterling in 2005-6 prices).

Results The average costs of intervention were £89 ({euro}113; $179) for standardised usual care, £181 for less intensive self monitoring, and £173 for more intensive self monitoring, showing an additional cost per patient of £92 (95% confidence interval £80 to £103) in the less intensive group and £84 (£73 to £96) in the more intensive group. No other significant cost difference was detected between the groups. An initial negative impact of self monitoring on quality of life occurred, averaging –0.027 (95% confidence interval–0.069 to 0.015) for the less intensive self monitoring group and –0.075 (–0.119 to –0.031) for the more intensive group.

Conclusions Self monitoring of blood glucose with or without additional training in incorporating the results into self care was associated with higher costs and lower quality of life in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes. In light of this, and no clinically significant differences in other outcomes, self monitoring of blood glucose is unlikely to be cost effective in addition to standardised usual care.

Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47464659 [controlled-trials.com] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Self monitoring of blood glucose: the cost to patients
Monika M Safford and Louise B Russell
BMJ 2008 336: 1263. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Self monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes
Martin Gulliford
BMJ 2008 336: 1139-1140. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial
Andrew Farmer, Alisha Wade, Elizabeth Goyder, Patricia Yudkin, David French, Anthea Craven, Rury Holman, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, and Andrew Neil
BMJ 2007 335: 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Implementing intensive control of blood glucose concentration and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes in England: cost analysis (UKPDS 63)
Alastair Gray, Philip Clarke, Andrew Farmer, and Rury Holman
BMJ 2002 325: 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gulliford, M. (2008). Self monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes. BMJ 336: 1139-1140 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Self monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes
Subrata K Mallik
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Self-monitoring of blood glucose: The cost to patients
Monika M. Safford, et al.
bmj.com, 2 May 2008 [Full text]
Musings of an Insulin Junkie.
Robert Matz
bmj.com, 28 May 2008 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Sepsis

The latest guidlines will affect how we practice medicine

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview