Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1134 (17 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39580.437593.59
Des Spence, general practitioner, Glasgow
destwo@yahoo.co.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"The JVP is a unicorn—a myth." All eyes turned to me. I knew it was mistake, a heinous blasphemy. There then followed an unholy medical inquisition. Despite my heresy I still religiously teach students how to test for jugular venous pressure, but when I suggest that it may be of highly limited value their eyes narrow suspiciously. For the JVP test is part of the holy scripture passed down through generations of doctors: the clinical examination.
But much of clinical examination is ritualistic ceremony—mere incense and incantation. Even the iconic stethoscope is really a redundant artefact, a medical prop. Yet cardiologists, with their cardiology stethoscopes, continue to tut and to lambast students on the character and timing of inaudible murmurs, even in the full knowledge of the echocardiogram report. Much clinical examination has remained largely unquestioned through the mists of time and is deployed to uphold a mystical faith in
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+