Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1111-1113 (17 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39508.606157.BE
Pamela B Garlick, senior lecturer in medical education and course director, extended medical degree programme1, Gavin Brown, lecturer in human geography2
1 Kings College London, London SE1 1UL , 2 University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH
Correspondence to: P B Garlick pamela.garlick@kcl.ac.uk
The extended medical degree programme at Kings College London shows that widening participation in medicine can be successful, but requires appreciable extra commitment by academic staff
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Todays prevailing view is that tomorrows doctors should reflect the social and ethnic diversity of the countries in which they practise. To this end, initiatives to widen participation have been started in medical schools in several countries. Some of these initiatives include a commitment by students to return to their "area of origin" for a specified number of years after qualifying, but most have no such restrictions.1 Widening the participation of previously under-represented groups is not a straightforward process, as is highlighted by the Schwartz report.2 The widening participation initiative at the Kings College London School of Medicine began in 2001. Our remit was to enable bright students from low achieving state schools in inner London to become doctors. Students from the first cohort graduated in June 2007.
In 2001, the first year of the extended medical degree programme (EMDP), 10 extra student places were allocated by the Higher Education
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses