Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1041-1043 (10 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39560.444468.AD
Jacqui Wise, freelance journalist
1 London
Jacquiyoung1@gmail.com
Are ultrasound machines truly the stethoscope of the 21st century? Should all doctors keep one in their back pocket? Jacqui Wise reports on the battle over ultrasound imaging
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Ultrasound machines were once the size of washing machines and used solely by radiologists and sonographers working in radiology departments. But in the past 10 years they have become cheaper, smaller, and more portable—the latest models are even pocket sized.
As a result ultrasound machines are increasingly used by non-radiologists as part of the clinical examination or to assist in practical procedures such as insertion of a central line. The number of general practitioners buying their own ultrasound machines has also gradually increased. So is this good or bad news for patients?
Gill Markham, vice president of the Royal College of Radiologists, says: "The price of an ultrasound machine has come down enormously to £5000-£10 000 [
6000-
12 000; $10 000-$20 000] and as a result they are used much more widely. Ultrasound has a reputation as a simple, easy test. It is easy to do but interpreting the
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+