Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:858-860 (19 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39534.451458.AD
Jeanne Lenzer, medical investigative journalist1, Shannon Brownlee, senior fellow2
1 New York, 2 New America Foundation, Washington, DC
Correspondence to: J Lenzer jeanne.lenzer@gmail.com
Patients are beginning to present with not only a web diagnosis but predictions of future disease. Jeanne Lenzer and Shannon Brownlee examine the problems of the rise in commercial genetic testing
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Do you want to Google your genes or peer into your future risks of heart disease or cancer? Now you can, according to direct to consumer testing companies. Gone are the days when genetic testing was limited to doctors ordering tests for rare, but prognostically potent, single gene disorders such as Huntingtons disease, Duchennes muscular dystrophy, or cystic fibrosis. Thanks to an explosion of newly discovered single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs (pronounced snips), companies are marketing genetic tests for traits ranging from the mundane—eye colour and wet ear wax—to serious conditions such as Crohns disease and Alzheimers disease.
While the global market for these tests is growing rapidly—estimated at $730m (£366m;
463m) last year and growing by 20% annually1—evidence that they can provide patients with clinically useful information is lagging far behind. There is little regulatory oversight of the tests, and even less in the way of clinical data
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?