Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:670 (22 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39524.519178.94
Rahij Anwar, specialist registrar, London, rahijanwar@hotmail.com, Nitish Gogi, registrar, West Midlands, Syed Neshat Anjum, registrar, London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"Treat the whole patient, not just a particular disease" used to be the guiding principle for most clinicians until the government decided to reconfigure the way in which healthcare services in England would be offered. Under its new plans, primary care trusts or general practitioners would directly commission specialised services. The trusts would pay for the treatment of their patients in hospitals—and this, in due course, would become the hospitals main source of income. The aim of such commissioning was to save huge sums of money by using hospital services as sparingly as possible.
Since its implementation this policy has not only jeopardised the future of many hospitals but has also led to considerable frustration and disappointment among patients. Perhaps the worst affected patients are those who have more than one condition at the same time. To primary care trusts these are very "expensive" patients, and therefore some of their
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+