Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:29-32 (5 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39395.500046.AE (published 17 December 2007)
Clare E Gilbert, reader in international eye health1, S P Shah, research fellow in ophthalmology 1, M Z Jadoon, consultant epidemiologist2, R Bourne, consultant ophthalmologist3, B Dineen, research fellow in epidemiology 1, M A Khan, executive director 2, G J Johnson, professor in ophthalmology 1, M D Khan, professor in ophthalmology 2, on behalf of the Pakistan National Eye Survey Study Group
1 International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, 2 Pakistan Institute of Community Ophthalmology, Peshawar, Pakistan, 3 Ophthalmology Department, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon, Cambridge
Correspondence to: C E Gilbert clare.gilbert{at}lshtm.ac.uk
Design Cross sectional population based survey.
Setting 221 rural and urban clusters selected randomly throughout Pakistan.
Participants Nationally representative sample of 16 507 adults aged 30 or above (95.3% response rate).
Main outcome measures Associations between visual impairment and poverty assessed by a cluster level deprivation index and a household level poverty indicator; prevalence and causes of blindness; measures of the rate of uptake and quality of eye care services.
Results 561 blind participants (<3/60 in the better eye) were identified during the survey. Clusters in urban Sindh province were the most affluent, whereas rural areas in Balochistan were the poorest. The prevalence of blindness in adults living in affluent clusters was 2.2%, compared with 3.7% in medium clusters and 3.9% in poor clusters (P<0.001 for affluent v poor). The highest prevalence of blindness was found in rural Balochistan (5.2%). The prevalence of total blindness (bilateral no light perception) was more than three times higher in poor clusters than in affluent clusters (0.24% v 0.07%, P<0.001). The prevalences of blindness caused by cataract, glaucoma, and corneal opacity were lower in affluent clusters and households. Reflecting access to eye care services, cataract surgical coverage was higher in affluent clusters (80.6%) than in medium (76.8%) and poor areas (75.1%). Intraocular lens implantation rates were significantly lower in participants from poorer households. 10.2% of adults living in affluent clusters presented to the examination station wearing spectacles, compared with 6.7% in medium clusters and 4.4% in poor cluster areas. Spectacle coverage in affluent areas was more than double that in poor clusters (23.5% v 11.1%, P<0.001).
Conclusion Blindness is associated with poverty in Pakistan; lower access to eye care services was one contributory factor. To reduce blindness, strategies targeting poor people will be needed. These interventions may have an impact on deprivation in Pakistan.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.