Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1299-1301 (22 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39414.582639.BE
Sreeram V Ramagopalan, DPhil candidate1,2, Marian Knight, senior clinical research fellow3, George C Ebers, professor of clinical neurology1,2, Julian C Knight, senior research fellow1
1 Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, 2 Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, 3 National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford
Correspondence to: J C Knight julian{at}well.ox.ac.uk
Design Literature review.
Setting Harry Potter novels of J K Rowling.
Participants Muggles, witches, wizards, and squibs.
Interventions Limited.
Main outcome measures Family and twin studies, magical ability, and specific magical skills.
Results Magic shows strong evidence of heritability, with familial aggregation and concordance in twins. Evidence suggests magical ability to be a quantitative trait. Specific magical skills, notably being able to speak to snakes, predict the future, and change hair colour, all seem heritable.
Conclusions A multilocus model with a dominant gene for magic might exist, controlled epistatically by one or more loci, possibly recessive in nature. Magical enhancers regulating gene expressionmay be involved, combined with mutations at specific genes implicated in speech and hair colour such as FOXP2 and MCR1.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses