Measuring performance and missing the point?

doi:10.1136/bmj.39377.387373.AD

BMJ 2007;335:1075-1076 (24 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39377.387373.AD

Analysis

Measuring quality through performance

Measuring performance and missing the point?

Iona Heath, general practitioner¹, Julia Hippisley-Cox, professor of clinical epidemiology and general practice², Liam Smeeth, professor of clinical epidemiology³

¹ Caversham Group Practice, London NW5 2UP, ² Nottingham University, Nottingham NG7 2RD, ³ London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London

Correspondence to: I Heath iona.heath@dsl.pipex.com

Targets do not necessarily translate into improvements for serviceusers. Iona Heath, Julia Hippisley-Cox, and Liam Smeeth arguethat performance measurement in the UK is shifting focus fromwhat each patient needs and those who need it most

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Since April 2004, the performance of general practitioners hasbeen measured and remunerated against a limited, although increasing,number of easily measurable clinical activities. This initiativeis unique worldwide and is attracting considerable internationalinterest. It therefore behoves us to think critically aboutwhat we are doing.

General practitioners have responded by systematically recordingthe listed activities, apparently performing well above expectation,and the whole exercise has been hailed as a success for qualityof care. Despite evidence that these sorts of incentives improvethe quality of documentation while having a much more limitedeffect on underlying standards of care,¹ there have undoubtedlybeen useful achievements. Of these, probably the most substantialare improvements in diabetic control and innovations in computerprompting systems. However, the system is in danger of missingthe point of both quality and general practice.

The clinical activities that are measured and rewarded by thequality . . . [Full text of this article]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike Add to Complore Complore Add to Connotea Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us Add to Digg Digg Add to Reddit Reddit Add to Technorati Technorati What's this?

Relevant Articles

Evidence of net benefit is lacking: Les J Toop and Dee Mangin
BMJ 2007 335: 1170. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Future of quality measurement: Helen Lester and Martin Roland
BMJ 2007 335: 1130-1131. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Careful what you measure: Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2007 335: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Respecting the subjective: quality measurement from the patient's perspective: Glyn Elwyn, Stephen Buetow, Judith Hibbard, and Michel Wensing
BMJ 2007 335: 1021-1022. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Making performance indicators work: experiences of US Veterans Health Administration: Eve A Kerr and Barbara Fleming
BMJ 2007 335: 971-973. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Improving the quality of care with performance indicators: Azeem Majeed, Helen Lester, and Andrew B Bindman
BMJ 2007 335: 916-918. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Association of deprivation, ethnicity, and sex with quality indicators for diabetes: population based survey of 53 000 patients in primary care: Julia Hippisley-Cox, Shaun O'Hanlon, and Carol Coupland
BMJ 2004 329: 1267-1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

Gellad, W. F., Detsky, A. S., Choudhry, N. K. (2009). Implications of recent clinical trials on pay-for-performance. Am J Health Syst Pharm 66: 864-867 [Full text]
Maisey, S., Steel, N., Marsh, R., Gillam, S., Fleetcroft, R., Howe, A. (2008). Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study. J Health Serv Res Policy 13: 133-139 [Abstract] [Full text]
Richardson, J. (2008). From the Trainer. InnovAiT 1: 215-215 [Full text]
Roscoe, T. J (2007). So what are we to do?. BMJ 335: 1170-1170 [Full text]
Toop, L. J, Mangin, D. (2007). Evidence of net benefit is lacking. BMJ 335: 1170-1170 [Full text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Measuring performance- but not quite missing the point: Peter J Campbell
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2007 [Full text]
So what are we to do: Trefor J Roscoe
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2007 [Full text]
QOF - Work in progress: William J Beeby
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2007 [Full text]
What do the public think?: Chris E Nancollas
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Does success mean success?: Clare A MacArthur
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Fucntion matters more than measured BP: Anthony E J Fitchett
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2007 [Full text]
I profoundly disagree: L Sam Lewis
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Understanding the Effects of the QoF: Andrew L Spooner
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Observing performance and missing the point?: Graham Wheatley
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Perfomance payment and fragmented thinking: Juan G�rvas
bmj.com, 26 Nov 2007 [Full text]
right and wrong foci of payment for performance: Barbara Starfield
bmj.com, 26 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Work in Progress: Christopher. L. Manning
bmj.com, 26 Nov 2007 [Full text]
What we measure defines who we are and what we value: Tracy Monk
bmj.com, 27 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Is there an art to medicine, or is it just bulk sales?: R. Warren Bell
bmj.com, 27 Nov 2007 [Full text]
It is the lack of evidence of the NET benefit of the framework itself, not the evidence around individual indicators that is the issue: Les J Toop, et al.
bmj.com, 28 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Performance...who measures, and how?: Mark E McConnell
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Punished by Rewards: Paul P Glasziou
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Re: It is the lack of evidence of the NET benefit of the framework itself, not the evidence around individual indicators that is the issue: L Sam Lewis
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Measure outcomes routinely: Tim Benson, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Goodhart's Law: Peter G Davies
bmj.com, 1 Dec 2007 [Full text]
Goodhart's Law: Richard Bartley
bmj.com, 3 Dec 2007 [Full text]
Dealing with conflicts between the QOF and patient care: Graham N Box
bmj.com, 4 Dec 2007 [Full text]