Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1054-1055 (24 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39377.490984.80 (published 16 November 2007)
Evidence is needed on how best to reduce inequalities
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A recent Unicef report ranked the wellbeing of children in 21 rich countries.1 The report aggregated national data on more than 40 indicators from credible sources in six dimensions—material wellbeing (related to income, poverty, material goods), health and safety, educational wellbeing, family and peer relationships, behaviours and risks, and subjective wellbeing (how the child sees his or her self). The press had a field day when the report was published,2 because the United States and the United Kingdom were in the bottom five countries for five of the dimensions. The UK ranked 12th in health and the US ranked 12th in education; questions were rightly asked about how this could happen and what the government was going to do about it.
In this week's BMJ, Pickett and Wilkinson3 attempt to explain the results of the Unicef report by combining the measures of wellbeing of children with national data on
M E Black, international health consultant and invited lecturer1, H E Jeffery, clinical associate professor2
1 Centre School of Public Health, Belgrade University, Senjak, Belgrade 11000 Serbia, 2 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Mothers and Babies and University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Sydney, Australia
drmaryblack@gmail.com
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.