Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:99 (14 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39272.443137.59
Jeffrey Braithwaite, professor and director, Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
j.braithwaite@unsw.edu.au
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Politicians are often criticised for saying one thing and doing another. Is the announcement last week by prime minister Gordon Brown and new health secretary Alan Johnson a further example? They are sponsoring a major review of the NHS while pledging to stop giving top-down instructions and ceasing centrally dictated restructuring.
What do major reviews produce, other than more instructions and new rounds of restructuring? This is especially contradictory given that Mr Brown and Mr Johnson, in making their announcement, argued that the NHS "cannot stand still," and the review's terms of reference stipulated that the way forward for the NHS is to be "clinically driven, patient centred, and responsive to local communities."
This review will surely try to reorganise from the top the way predecessor reviews didprincipally, through above-down measures. It is unlikely politicians will leave implementation to an independent NHS.1 In politicians, the strong desire to be seen
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses