Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:74 (14 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.39259.472998.AD
Richard Smith, executive director
UnitedHealth Europe, London SW1P 1SB
richardswsmith@yahoo.co.uk
No one can fail to notice the adverts in medical journals but are they really necessary? Richard Smith maintains they are essential to editorial independence, whereas Gareth Williams argues that they undermine a journal's integrity
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The central argument for carrying advertising in medical journals is independence. Ironically, the main argument against may also be independence, but you can place greater trust in a journal that carries advertising than one that does not.
Independence is a journal's most precious asset, and independence means financial independence. "He who pays the piper calls the tune." So to be able to play multiple tunes a journal needs multiple sources of incomeand drug advertising is one of the most important and profitable. The beauty of drug advertising is that there are many companies who want to advertise in a journal that has a wide circulation. This means that none of them alone has the power to influence the journal.
Advertisers may huff and puff in response to articles that upset them, and they may for a while take away their advertising. But the journal doesn't depend on any one advertiserand
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses