BMJ  2007;334:1254-1256 (16 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39227.698785.47

Analysis

How effective are expert patient (lay led) education programmes for chronic disease?

Chris Griffiths, professor of primary care, Gill Foster, senior research fellow, Jean Ramsay, senior research fellow, Sandra Eldridge, reader in statistics, Stephanie Taylor, senior clinical lecturer in health services research

Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 2AT

Correspondence to: C Griffiths c.j.griffiths@qmul.ac.uk

Considerable hyperbole has surrounded the UK expert patient programme, and it has received considerable funding—but will its impact meet expectations?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Chronic conditions now account for 60% of deaths worldwide and are imposing an increasing burden on society and health services.1 Self management programmes are commonly used to help patients learn the skills to manage their own conditions better.2 The NHS in the United Kingdom, and countries in Europe (especially Scandinavia), Australasia, and North America have chosen specifically to use courses tutored by trained lay leaders, rather than health professionals such as nurses.3 Considerable resources have been allocated to support and run such programmes. A major attraction for healthcare planners has been the expectation that such courses will reduce use of health care and will deliver long term cost savings.4 More debate about the impact of lay led, self management programmes is needed. This article opens up this debate and examines the evidence that "expert patients" consume fewer healthcare resources, with particular reference to data from trials in the UK.

Two . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: beyond the expert patient
Trisha Greenhalgh
BMJ 2009 338: b49. [Extract] [Full Text]

Support for self care for patients with chronic disease
Anne Kennedy, Anne Rogers, and Peter Bower
BMJ 2007 335: 968-970. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Self management of arthritis in primary care: randomised controlled trial
Marta Buszewicz, Greta Rait, Mark Griffin, Irwin Nazareth, Anita Patel, Angela Atkinson, Julie Barlow, and Andy Haines
BMJ 2006 333: 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS
Liam Donaldson
BMJ 2003 326: 1279-1280. [Full Text] [PDF]

Paternalism or partnership?
Angela Coulter
BMJ 1999 319: 719-720. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Biddiss, E., Brownsell, S., Hawley, M. S (2009). Predicting need for intervention in individuals with congestive heart failure using a home-based telecare system. J Telemed Telecare 15: 226-231 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Greenhalgh, T. (2009). Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ 338: b49-b49 [Full text]  
  • Lorig, K. R., Ritter, P. L., Dost, A., Plant, K., Laurent, D. D., Mcneil, I. (2008). The expert patients programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions. Chronic Illness 4: 247-256 [Abstract]  
  • Colagiuri, S., Walker, A. E. (2008). Using An Economic Model Of Diabetes To Evaluate Prevention And Care Strategies In Australia. Health Aff (Millwood) 27: 256-268 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kennedy, A., Rogers, A., Bower, P. (2007). Support for self care for patients with chronic disease. BMJ 335: 968-970 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Expert Patient Programmes: disappointing for patients and clinicians
Amanda C de C Williams
bmj.com, 30 Jun 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ