BMJ  2007;334:1253 (16 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39232.496227.47

Feature

Head to head

Should folic acid fortification be mandatory? No

Richard A Hubner, clinical research training fellow1, Richard D Houlston, professor of molecular genetics1, Kenneth R Muir, professor of epidemiology2

1 Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Cancer Genetics, Sutton SM2 5NG, 2 University of Nottingham, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH

Correspondence to: R Hubner richard.hubner@icr.ac.uk

The UK's Food Standards Agency recently recommended mandatory folic acid fortification of some foods. Nicholas Wald and Godfrey Oakley argue that it's a safe effective way of preventing spina bifida and anencephaly—but Richard Hubner and colleagues say that more research into the harms is needed

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Mandatory fortification with folic acid aims to increase intake of folate in women during early pregnancy and to reduce neural tube defects in their babies. The case for mandatory fortification is strengthened by the purported association of increased intake of folate with reduced incidence of cancer, thus benefiting the whole population. But new data suggest that folate supplements may paradoxically have cancer promoting effects, enhancing the development and progression of undiagnosed premalignant and malignant lesions.

Folate metabolism is complex and influences several crucial pathways, including DNA synthesis and methylation, aberrations of which play a major role in carcinogenesis. Altered folate metabolism may disrupt these processes, providing mechanisms through which both folate deficiency and supplementation could influence cancer risk. This relation may be further complicated by using synthetic folic acid in supplements and fortification: its effects on folate metabolism are not identical to those of natural folates.1

Epidemiological studies have found . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Clarify the neurological risks
Edward Reynolds
BMJ 2007 335: 171. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should folic acid fortification be mandatory? Yes
Nicholas J Wald and Godfrey P Oakley
BMJ 2007 334: 1252. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Folic acid, homocysteine, and cardiovascular disease: judging causality in the face of inconclusive trial evidence
David S Wald, Nicholas J Wald, Joan K Morris, and Malcolm Law
BMJ 2006 333: 1114-1117. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kim, Y.-I. (2008). Folic Acid Supplementation and Cancer Risk: Point. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17: 2220-2225 [Full text]  
  • Reynolds, E. (2007). Clarify the neurological risks. BMJ 335: 171-171 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ