BMJ  2007;334:1252 (16 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39232.493252.47

Feature

Head to head

Should folic acid fortification be mandatory? Yes

Nicholas J Wald, director1, Godfrey P Oakley, professor2

1 Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, 2 Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

Correspondence to: N J Wald n.j.wald@qmul.ac.uk

The UK's Food Standards Agency recently recommended mandatory folic acid fortification of some foods. Nicholas Wald and Godfrey Oakley argue that it's a safe effective way of preventing spina bifida and anencephaly—but Richard Hubner and colleagues say that more research into the harms is needed

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Delay in fortifying flour with folic acid is unjustified. In many countries this public health measure has increased blood folate levels and reduced neural tube defects. When the effect of folic acid on neural tube defects was shown in 1991, prevention was attempted through diet and supplements.1 But supplements must be taken before pregnancy is confirmed, and most pregnancies remain unprotected.

Voluntary fortification has proved inadequate. Expert advisory committees considering mandatory fortification with folic acid have concluded that it is necessary, effective, and safe; about 40 countries, including the United States, have adopted this policy.

It is important to reach people who are less well off—they have most to gain from fortification. In Chile, where fortification has achieved a relatively high folic acid intake, neural tube defects were reduced by 43%; in the United States, with a lower fortification level, the reduction was about 20%.2 With fortification on a global . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Clarify the neurological risks
Edward Reynolds
BMJ 2007 335: 171. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should folic acid fortification be mandatory? No
Richard A Hubner, Richard D Houlston, and Kenneth R Muir
BMJ 2007 334: 1253. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kim, Y.-I. (2008). Folic Acid Supplementation and Cancer Risk: Point. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17: 2220-2225 [Full text]  
  • Refsum, H., Smith, A D. (2008). Are we ready for mandatory fortification with vitamin B-12?. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 88: 253-254 [Full text]  
  • Reynolds, E. (2007). Clarify the neurological risks. BMJ 335: 171-171 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

folic acid fortification: people should be able to choose
Jeanne A Pawitan
bmj.com, 16 Jun 2007 [Full text]
A minor quibble
Daniel R Hicks
bmj.com, 19 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Folic Acid Fortification
Edward Reynolds
bmj.com, 5 Jul 2007 [Full text]
One man's meat is another man's poison
Will D Carroll, et al.
bmj.com, 6 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Re: One man's meat is another man's poison
Eddie Vos
bmj.com, 8 Jul 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ