Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:447 (3 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39140.456030.DB
Zosia Kmietowicz
London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The law that requires drug companies to pay "user fees" to the US Food and Drug Administration for every drug they submit for approval should not be renewed when it comes before Congress later this year, says a former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Writing an open editorial in the Boston Globe, Marcia Angell, who worked for the journal between 1979 and 2000, most recently as editor in chief, said that the Prescription Drug User Fee Act has, in effect, "put the FDA on the payroll of the industry it regulates" (www.boston.com, 26 Feb, "Taking back the FDA").
The act, which was passed by Congress in 1992, "put the fox in the chicken coop" and has changed the focus of the agency, which now serves the industry rather than the public, says Dr Angell.
Nearly all of the $300m (£153m;
230m) that the fees
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?