BMJ  2007;334:45 (6 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39072.461979.59

reViews

Medical journals: past their sell by date?

Stuart W G Derbyshire, senior lecturer, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham

s.w.derbyshire@bham.ac.uk

A former BMJ editor lets rip about medical journals, but is he right? asks Stuart Derbyshire

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

According to Richard Smith, former editor of the BMJ, there is much trouble with medical journals. Medical journals include studies that are often misleading through author negligence, a failure of peer review, a conflict of interest, or because of blatant fraud. Medical journals are insensitive to the needs of patients and too responsive to the needs of the big pharmaceutical companies. Medical journals employ poorly trained editors who are blind to the ethical abuses documented in submitted studies. Medical journals even look awful and there are too many of them.

To an extent, Smith is following in the footsteps of other "miserabilist" tracts regarding the state of the world in general and medical science in particular. But Smith does, at least, manage to do it with some humour. It is hard not to warm to an author who explains that publication does not equal editorial support with the following . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Benificence vs self interest
Mark Worsley
bmj.com, 8 Jan 2007 [Full text]
What a Review!
Jay Ilangaratne
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2007 [Full text]
BMJ wastes opportunity to raise serious issues
Pritpal S Tamber
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2007 [Full text]
Patients and journals
Liz Wager
bmj.com, 11 Jan 2007 [Full text]
Complacency in the School of Psychology in Birmingham
Iain Chalmers
bmj.com, 12 Jan 2007 [Full text]
Knocking Clinical Science
Raymond Courteney Tallis
bmj.com, 12 Jan 2007 [Full text]
Using the public
David M Perks
bmj.com, 14 Jan 2007 [Full text]
Richard Smith's book
Alex Paton
bmj.com, 16 Jan 2007 [Full text]
The author responds
Stuart WG Derbyshire
bmj.com, 20 Jan 2007 [Full text]
Re: The author responds
Jay Ilangaratne
bmj.com, 27 Jan 2007 [Full text]
When "Peer Review" Means "Not Peer Reviewed"
Clifford G. Miller
bmj.com, 16 Feb 2007 [Full text]
Why did I write a book that was so critical of medical journals? A gallimaufry of theories
Richard Smith
bmj.com, 14 Mar 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ