Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Commentary is inaccurate
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
We endorse the response of Baigent and others to Cleland's
commentary on the Antithrombotic Trialists' antiplatelet meta-analysis.1-3 We would like to add some further
comments in response to Cleland's article and the editorial in the
same issue.4
Both suggest that the data in the meta-analysis were revised retrospectively. But the overview methods were planned prospectively. Differences between the data in trial publications and the dataset used for the meta-analysis occurred where trialists provided additional information on the numbers of patients originally randomised, or on unpublished or subsequently available outcomes for small numbers of patients. Minor differences between the current and previous antiplatelet overviews generally relate to additional, unpublished data from a few trials and do not affect any of the results or conclusions.
The claim by Reilly and FitzGerald that the absolute reduction in
vascular events with antiplatelet treatment is smaller in acute
ischaemic stroke than in other