Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
David Clark Academic Palliative Medicine Unit,
University
of Sheffield, Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sykes House, Sheffield S11
9NE d.clark@sheffield.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Palliative care has encouraged medicine to be gentler in its acceptance of death, yet medical services in general continue to regard death as something to be resisted, postponed, or avoided. David Hart examines the challenge facing doctors to balance technical intervention with a humanistic approach to their dying patients
We have grown used to speaking of medicalisation as a
byword for all things negative about the influence of modern medicine on life and society. The term has become synonymous with the sense of a
profession reaching too far: into the body, the mind, and even the soul
itself. Its use is now almost always pejorative, negative, and
antagonistic. When Ivan Illich developed his original critique of
medicalisation in the mid-1970s, he highlighted its particular impact
upon the dying process in modern culture and could claim that modern
medicine had "brought the epoch of natural death to an end" (box
1
Read all Rapid Responses