Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Melanie Hingorani Central Eye Unit, Central Middlesex Hospital,
London NW10 7NS
Correspondence to:
Mrs Hingorani
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
Unintended injuries (adverse events) caused during
treatment are much more common than previously believed.1
Recent legal and disciplinary cases have shown that, although patients
are increasingly dissatisfied with a perceived lack of openness in the
medical profession, doctors are not legally obliged to provide an
explanation after an adverse event.2 Because of this, the General Medical Council has revised its guidance on good medical practice, stating that after an adverse event a full and honest explanation and an apology should be provided routinely.3
We surveyed patients' and doctors' attitudes to the provision of information to patients after a hypothetical adverse event in cataract surgery.
| |
Subjects, methods, and results |
|---|
A specifically designed questionnaire (box) was used to survey all
patients attending a consultant ophthalmologist's clinic during
five weeks in 1998; 246 of 302 (81%) patients agreed to participate.
All 48 ophthalmologists attending a regional meeting also participated.
The questionnaire asked about the postoperative information that
should be given
Read all Rapid Responses