Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness and acceptability of an early discharge, hospital at home scheme with acute hospital care

BMJ 1998;316:1796-1801 ( 13 June )

General Practice

Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness and acceptability of an early discharge, hospital at home scheme with acute hospital care

Editorial by IliffeGeneral practice p 1786, 1791, 1802

Suzanne H Richards, research associate, ^a Joanna Coast, lecturer in health economics, ^a David J Gunnell, senior lecturer in epidemiology and public health medicine, ^a Tim J Peters, reader in medical statistics, ^a John Pounsford, consultant physician, care of the elderly, ^b Mary-Anne Darlow, hospital at home team coordinator. ^c

^a Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, ^b Day Hospital, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE, ^c Hospital-at-Home, Downend Clinic, Bristol BS16 5TW

Correspondence to: Suzanne Richards suzanne.richards{at}bris.ac.uk

Objective: To compare effectiveness and acceptability of early discharge to a hospital at home scheme with that ofroutine discharge from acute hospital.
Design: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Acute hospital wards and community in north of Bristol, with a catchment population of about 224 000 people.
Subjects: 241 hospitalised but medically stable elderly patients who fulfilled criteria for early discharge to hospital at home scheme and who consented to participate.
Interventions: Patients' received hospital at home care or routine hospital care.
Main outcome measures: Patients' quality of life, satisfaction, and physical functioning assessed at 4 weeks and 3months after randomisation to treatment; length of stay in hospitaland in hospital at home scheme after randomisation; mortalityat 3 months.
Results: There were no significant differences in patient mortality, quality of life, and physical functioning between the two arms of the trial at 4 weeks or 3 months. Only one of11 measures of patient satisfaction was significantly different:hospital at home patients perceived higher levels of involvementin decisions. Length of stay for those receiving routine hospitalcare was 62% (95% confidence interval 51% to 75%) of length ofstay in hospital at home scheme.
Conclusions: The early discharge hospital at home scheme was similar to routine hospital discharge in terms of effectivenessand acceptability. Increased length of stay associated with thescheme must be interpreted with caution because of different organisationalcharacteristics of the services.

Key messages

Pressure on hospital beds, the increasing age of the population, and high costs associated with acute hospital care have fuelled the search for alternatives to inpatient hospital care
There were no significant differences between early discharge to hospital at home scheme and routine hospital care in terms of patient quality of life, physical functioning, and most measures of patient satisfaction
Length of stay for hospital patients was significantly shorter than that of hospital at home patients, but, owing to qualitative differences between the two interventions, this does not necessarily mean differences in effectiveness
Early discharge to hospital at home provides an acceptable alternative to routine hospital care in terms of effectiveness and patient acceptability

© BMJ 1998

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us Add to Digg

Digg

StumbleUpon Add to Technorati

Technorati What's this?

Relevant Articles

Acceptability of early discharge, hospital at home schemes: M Montalto, M L Grayson, David A Seamark, Clare J Seamark, Sasha Shepperd, Crispin Jenkinson, Diana Harwood, Alastair Gray, Martin Vessey, and Patrick Morgan
BMJ 1998 317: 1652. [Extract] [Full Text]

Hospital at home is effective and acceptable but it's not clear whether it is cheaper
BMJ 1998 316: 0. [Full Text]

Hospital at home: from red to amber?: Steve Iliffe
BMJ 1998 316: 1761-1762. [Extract] [Full Text]

Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes: Sasha Shepperd, Diana Harwood, Crispin Jenkinson, Alastair Gray, Martin Vessey, and Patrick Morgan
BMJ 1998 316: 1786-1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. II: cost minimisation analysis: Sasha Shepperd, Diana Harwood, Alastair Gray, Martin Vessey, and Patrick Morgan
BMJ 1998 316: 1791-1796. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis: Joanna Coast, Suzanne H Richards, Tim J Peters, David J Gunnell, Mary-Anne Darlow, and John Pounsford
BMJ 1998 316: 1802-1806. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

Shepperd, S. MSc DPhil, Doll, H. MSc DPhil, Angus, R. M. MBChB, Clarke, M. J. MA DPhil, Iliffe, S. BSc MBBS, Kalra, L. MD PhD, Ricauda, N. A. MD, Tibaldi, V. MD PhD, Wilson, A. D. MD (2009). Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. CMAJ 180: 175-182 [Abstract] [Full text]
Caplan, G. A., Coconis, J., Board, N., Sayers, A., Woods, J. (2006). Does home treatment affect delirium? A randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation of elderly and care at home or usual treatment (The REACH-OUT trial). Age Ageing 35: 53-60 [Abstract] [Full text]
Caplan, G. A., Coconis, J., Woods, J. (2005). Effect of Hospital in the Home Treatment on Physical and Cognitive Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 60: 1035-1038 [Abstract] [Full text]
(2005). Statement on Home Care for Patients with Respiratory Disorders. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 171: 1443-1464 [Full text]
Weinrich, M., Stuart, M., Hoyer, T. (2005). Rules for Rehabilitation: An Agenda for Research. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 19: 72-83 [Abstract]
Reishtein, J. L (2005). Review: hospital at home is as effective as inpatient care for mortality and hospital readmissions in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Evid. Based Nurs. 8: 23-23 [Full text]
Ram, F. S F, Wedzicha, J. A, Wright, J., Greenstone, M. (2004). Hospital at home for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review of evidence. BMJ 329: 315- [Abstract] [Full text]
Bagust, A, Haycox, A, Sartain, S A, Maxwell, M J, Todd, P (2002). Economic evaluation of an acute paediatric hospital at home clinical trial. Arch. Dis. Child. 87: 489-492 [Abstract] [Full text]
Dubois, A., Santos-Eggimann, B. (2001). Evaluation of Patients' Satisfaction with Hospital-At-Home Care. Eval Health Prof 24: 84-98 [Abstract]
Campbell, J. (2001). Inappropriate admissions: thoughts of patients and referring doctors. JRSM 94: 628-631 [Abstract] [Full text]
Grande, G E, Todd, C J, Barclay, S I G, Farquhar, M C (2000). A randomized controlled trial of a hospital at home service for the terminally ill. Palliat Med 14: 375-385 [Abstract]
Richards, S. H, Peters, T. J, Coast, J., Gunnell, D. J, Darlow, M.-A., Pounsford, J. (2000). Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel ADL Index: how does a researcher compare to a nurse?. Clin Rehabil 14: 72-78 [Abstract]
Wilson, A., Parker, H., Wynn, A., Jagger, C., Spiers, N., Jones, J., Parker, G. (1999). Randomised controlled trial of effectiveness of Leicester hospital at home scheme compared with hospital care. BMJ 319: 1542-1546 [Abstract] [Full text]
Jones, J., Wilson, A., Parker, H., Wynn, A., Jagger, C., Spiers, N., Parker, G. (1999). Economic evaluation of hospital at home versus hospital care: cost minimisation analysis of data from randomised controlled trial. BMJ 319: 1547-1550 [Abstract] [Full text]
Hensher, M., Fulop, N., Coast, J., Jefferys, E. (1999). The hospital of the future: Better out than in? Alternatives to acute hospital care. BMJ 319: 1127-1130 [Full text]
Montalto, M. (1999). Home is where the health care is. CMAJ 161: 365-366 [Full text]
Messecar, D. (1999). "Hospital at home" care was as effective as routine hospital care for older adults. Evid. Based Nurs. 2: 50-50 [Full text]
Sims, J., Rink, E., Cleary, M., Pearson, C., Lloyd, K., Lilford, R J, Shaw, H., Coast, J., Richards, S. H, Peters, T. J, Gunnell, D. J, Darlow, M.-A., Pounsford, J. (1998). Hospital at home. BMJ 317: 1651-1651 [Full text]
Montalto, M, Grayson, M L, Seamark, D. A, Seamark, C. J, Shepperd, S., Jenkinson, C., Harwood, D., Gray, A., Vessey, M., Morgan, P. (1998). Acceptability of early discharge, hospital at home schemes. BMJ 317: 1652-1652 [Full text]
Coast, J., Richards, S. H, Peters, T. J, Gunnell, D. J, Darlow, M.-A., Pounsford, J. (1998). Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis. BMJ 316: 1802-1806 [Abstract] [Full text]