BMJ 1998;316:965-969 ( 28 March )

Papers

Is day care equivalent to inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis? Randomised controlled clinical and economic evaluation

C Michael Lambert, consultant rheumatologista Nigel P Hurst, consultant rheumatologista John F Forbes, senior lecturer in health economicsb Alison Lochhead, research assistanta Mary Macleod, clinical metrologista George Nuki, professor of rheumatologya

a Rheumatic Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, b Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG

Correspondence to: Dr Lambert

Objective: To test the clinical equivalence and resource consequences of day care with inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis.
Design: Randomised controlled clinical trial with integrated cost minimisation economic evaluation.
Setting: Rheumatic diseases unit at a teaching hospital between 1994 and 1996. 
Subjects: 118 consecutive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis randomised to receive either day care or inpatient care.
Main outcome measures: Clinical assessments recorded on admission, discharge, and follow up at 12 months comprised: the health assessment questionnaire, Ritchie articular index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and Steinbrocker functional class. Resource estimates were of the direct and indirect costs relating to treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Secondary outcome measures (health utility) were ascertained by time trade off and with the quality of well being scale.
Results: Both groups had improvement in scores on the health assessment questionnaire and Ritchie index and erythrocyte sedimentation rate after hospital treatment (P<0.0001) but clinical outcome did not differ significantly between the groups either at discharge or follow up. The mean hospital cost per patient for day care, £798 (95% confidence interval £705 to £888), was lower than for inpatient care, £1253 (£1155 to £1370), but this difference was offset by higher community, travel, and readmission costs. The difference in total cost per patient between day care and inpatient care was small (£1789 (£1539 to £2027) v £2021 (£1834 to £2230)). Quantile regression analysis showed a cost difference in favour of day care up to the 50th centile (£374; £639 to £109).
Conclusions: Day care and inpatient care for patients with uncomplicated active rheumatoid arthritis have equivalent clinical outcome with a small difference in overall resource cost in favour of day care. The choice of management strategy may depend increasingly on convenience, satisfaction, or more comprehensive health measures reflecting the preferences of patients, providers, and service commissioners.

Key messages

  • Day care and conventional inpatient care are clinically equivalent for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

  • The overall resource costs of day care are slightly lower than those of inpatient care

  • Day care is associated with lower hospital costs but higher costs to patient and family; nevertheless half of all patients studied expressed a preference for day care

  • Clinical benefit from either day care or inpatient care is short lived




© BMJ 1998

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Inpatient and day care are equally good in acute rheumatoid arthritis
BMJ 1998 316: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Verhoef, J., Toussaint, P., Putter, H., Zwetsloot-Schonk, J., Vliet Vlieland, T. (2008). Validity and responsiveness of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile (RAP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rehabil 22: 788-800 [Abstract]  
  • Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M. (2007). Non-drug care for RA is the era of evidence-based practice approaching?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 1397-1404 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van den Hout, W B, Tijhuis, G J, Hazes, J M W, Breedveld, F C, Vliet Vlieland, T P M (2003). Cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of multidisciplinary care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised comparison of clinical nurse specialist care, inpatient team care, and day patient team care. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 308-315 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cairns, A. P., Wright, S. A., Patton, J. D., Campalani, E., Taggart, A. J. (2002). Rheumatology day care and the impact of biological therapies--the Belfast experience. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41: 356-357 [Full text]  
  • Girard, F., Guillemin, F., Novella, J. L., Valckenaere, I., Krzanowska, K., Vitry, F., Vittecoq, O., Eschard, J. P., Blanchard, F., Le Loet, X. (2002). Health-care use by rheumatoid arthritis patients compared with non-arthritic subjects. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41: 167-175 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Tijhuis, G J, Jansen, S J T, Stiggelbout, A M, Zwinderman, A H, Hazes, J M W, Vlieland, T P M V. (2000). Value of the time trade off method for measuring utilities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 59: 892-897 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thompson, S. G, Barber, J. A (2000). How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?. BMJ 320: 1197-1200 [Full text]  
  • Barber, J. A, Thompson, S. G (1998). Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies. BMJ 317: 1195-1200 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ