BMJ 1994;309:1071-1072 (22 October)

Education and debate

Unevaluated or inefficient approaches are hard to justify

I Marks 

Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF.

The limited resources available for health make it important that money is spent in the best interests of patients. If money is spent on inefficient treatments there is less available for good care, so routine methods should have had their value proved in randomised controlled trials. This ideal is hard to attain. Randomised controlled trials cost time and money and only a minority of medical treatments have been evaluated in this way. To draw firm conclusions several randomised controlled trials in varying circumstances are usually needed and, for chronic conditions, follow up is essential to show that gains last. Finally, treatments which work in randomised controlled trials must be shown to be helpful in audit of routine care.

Given our imperfect knowledge, which are efficient psychotherapies and which not? Which have been well evaluated, for which problems in which circumstances, at what cost, and who can deliver them? Such . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ