Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:778-782 (2 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.778
N Aadil, assistant professor1, I E Houti, assistant professor1, S Moussamih, assistant professor1
1 Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 19 Rue Tarik Bnou Ziad, Casablanca 20000, Morocco
Correspondence to: N Aadil aadil_nadia{at}yahoo.fr
Aslam et al surveyed 81 patients to determine the alterations they made to their drug regimens during the fasting period of Ramadan.1 They found that 42% of the patients adhered to their usual treatment, and 58% changed their intake pattern. Among the second group, 35 patients stopped their treatments, eight changed the administration schedule, and four took all the daily doses in one intake. Another survey of 325 outpatients in a Kuwaiti hospital found that most of them changed their drug regimens during Ramadan.2 Sixty four per cent of the patients changed their therapeutic scheme during the month; 18% took their daily medicines in a single intake, either before the first meal (sunset) or straight after the last one (before dawn). The authors warned about the high risk of drug interactions in such cases. In fact, a 57 year old woman with heart failure experienced side effects of digitalis after being treated with both a thiazide diuretic and a digitalis compound. According to the authors, the concomitant intake of those two drugs induced a drop in potassium following a diuretic induced decrease in water retention, which led to an increase in sensitivity of heart muscle to digitalis.
Wheatly and Shelly reported that two patients with chronic reversible respiratory disease were admitted to an intensive care unit two weeks after the start of Ramadan. Both patients subsequently admitted to not having taken their treatment, including inhalers, during daylight hours.3 A prospective study evaluated the changes in frequency of seizures during Ramadan in 124 patients with idiopathic epilepsy. Seizures occurred in 27 patients during this month; 20 of them did not use any antiepileptic drugs from dawn to sunset. The author concluded that withdrawal of drugs was the most important cause of recurrence of epilepsy during Ramadan.4
|
The main emphasis of the authors of these studies was that most of the patients did not receive any particular information about changing their treatment during Ramadan. In the face of this arbitrary use of drugs during Ramadan, drug intake needs to be adapted according to the prescription componentsthe route of administration, the rhythm and schedule of administration, and interaction with food intake. In this paper we review current knowledge on this subject.
A majority of participants added:
Single daily dose
The easiest situation is that of patients who have a usual evening dose. Their therapeutic scheme remains unchanged during Ramadan, as it does not interfere with fasting. When the usual intake is in the morning or during the day, the doctor must be careful when delaying the intake to the evening that this will not alter the efficacy of treatment or the tolerance of the drug.
The efficacy and toxicity of many drugs can vary depending on the time of administration in relation to the circadian rhythms of biochemical, physiological, and behavioural processes. Thus, circadian time has to be taken into account as an important factor influencing a drug's pharmacokinetics or its effects or side effects. Table 1 summarises the results of some chronopharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies for selected drugs.w1-w12
|
Few studies have investigated this subject in relation to Ramadan. A comparative study of the pharmacokinetics of theophylline before and during Ramadan in healthy volunteers showed a significant decrease in the amount of drug absorbed for the 8 pm intake (two hours after Iftar) compared with the 4 am intake (immediately after Sohour).6 This result was mainly explained by the changes in the circadian variations of the gastric pH and by the modifications of rhythms and quality of meals during Ramadan.7
A similar study on the pharmacokinetics of valproic acid in healthy volunteers showed a significant influence of the alterations to life rhythm and administration schedule on the pharmacokinetic parameters of this drug. In addition to the delayed absorption phase for the 8 pm intake during Ramadan, the main impairment was a significant decrease in the plasma elimination half life for the 5 am intake compared with the same intake time outside Ramadan.8 As this parameter determines the administration schedule, it would be relevant to monitor the use of this antiepileptic drug during Ramadan.
Studies on antihypertensive drugs have not shown any significant effect on their efficacy from either the Ramadan life rhythm or the changes in administration schedule.9 10 These studies were done in patients with high blood pressure and treated by once daily preparations, before and during Ramadan. All patients in these studies continued their drugs during Ramadan. The results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the first study did not show any significant differences between the periods before Ramadan and during Ramadan in systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, 24 hour pressure, diurnal pressure, or nocturnal pressure.9 However, the authors observed that during the month of Ramadan the peak of the awakening is delayed by two hours and the nocturnal trough is delayed by one hour. The administration schedules in this study were not the same in the two time periods. The patients took their drugs at 8 am outside Ramadan and at the break of fasting (7-8 pm) during Ramadan. Perk et al reported similar results of 24 hour blood pressure monitoring before Ramadan and during the last week of Ramadan in 70 hypertensive patients, all of whom continued their once daily antihypertensive drugs during Ramadan.10 No significant differences were found between mean blood pressure or blood pressure load before and during Ramadan. The authors of both studies concluded that in patients with essential hypertension without complications, fasting during the month of Ramadan can be safely undertaken with continuation of previous drug treatment.
|
|
Fasting from dawn to dusk during Ramadan could cause problems with drug dosage regimens for Muslim patients
|
Saour et al evaluated, over a period of five years, the efficacy and tolerance of a long acting oral anticoagulant in two groups of patients.11 During this period, the 106 patients in the first group made the Ramadan fast, whereas the 183 patients in the second group did not fast. All the patients in the first group took their drugs at night rather than during the day. The incidence of thromboembolic events and haemorrhagic complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The authors concluded that Ramadan fasting has no adverse effects on the efficacy and safety of long term oral anticoagulant treatment.
Two or more daily doses
During Ramadan, accurate distribution of drugs prescribed twice a day is difficult to achieve between the break from fasting and the beginning of fasting. Refraining from fasting according to the Islamic rules could be a wiser prescription. Nonetheless, patients with two doses could take the first one at the break of fasting and the second one before the beginning of fasting, in which case the dosing time and the time span between the doses are both altered. These alterations could affect the drug's plasma concentration profile and, therefore, its efficacy and tolerance. This is even more relevant for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index as the risk of toxicity is higher.
In fact, Daghfous et al reported an influence of fasting on the pharmacokinetics and side effects of a sustained release preparation of theophylline taken twice a day.12 The study included 12 patients with current stable asthma and was done in two stagesthe first stage was during Ramadan, and the second stage was four weeks after the end of Ramadan. In both periods, the patients received two oral doses of theophylline, one just before dawn (3 am) and the second at sunset (7 pm) for five days. Outside Ramadan, only four out of 12 patients reported adverse events of minor nausea. During the fast of Ramadan, eight out of 12 patients reported adverse effects of abdominal pain and nausea. Six of them had also vomiting; fasting was then interrupted. In these patients, the blood theophylline concentrations were moderately, but not significantly, higher than in the patients without marked gastrointestinal problems. The authors concluded that a longer acting preparation taken in a single daily dose, preferably at the end of the night, would be a solution for asthmatic patients during Ramadan.
In the event of therapeutic problems during Ramadan, the number of doses should be reduced by using, when available, slow release formulations or chronotherapeutic formulations. Verapamil hydrochloride (Verelan PM, Covera-HS),13 propranolol CR (Innopran XL),14 diltiazem hydrochloride (graded release diltiazem),15 and tulobuterol (tulobuterol transdermal therapeutic system),16 are some of the new chronotherapeutic formulations available. Otherwise, a drug with a longer elimination half life should be used. Such drugs will have a longer duration of action and can therefore be taken at longer intervals, such as once a day. This is the case with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that are used for joint disease such as arthritis: ibuprofen (half life 2-3 hours), flurbiprofen (3-4 hours), naproxen (12-15 hours), and piroxicam (26-38 hours) are some examples. Patients who are prescribed drugs such as ibuprofen or flurbiprofen need to take doses three or four times a day to maintain a concentration of the drug in the body tissues sufficient to provide adequate pain relief. These drugs could be replaced by a single daily dose of piroxicam, which is more suitable for the fasting patient.17
|
The quality of the food eaten during the fast breaking meal could also have an influence on the absorption of some drugs. Beverages such as tea, coffee, and orange juice can increase gastric acidity, which increases the absorption of weak acids such as salicylates, dipyridamole, sulfamides, and some antibiotics and hypnotics; the action of pethidine, amitriptyline, and antihistamines may be inhibited. The high concentration of fat and carbohydrates at this meal could alter the bioavailability of drugs, but this alteration depends on the formulation used. For example, the intake of free acid phenytoin, as Hydantol powder, with a high fat meal increased its bioavailability,18 whereas the intake of an extended release phenytoin sodium formulation (Phenytek) with a high fat meal decreased its bioavailability.19
The clinical impact of such interactions depends on the narrowness of the drug's therapeutic index. An alteration in bioavailability as a result of these interactions could have a substantial effect on the plasma concentration of a drug, particularly a drug with a narrow therapeutic index, leading to reduced efficacy or increased side effects.
According to the data that are available, patients arbitrarily modify the times of doses, the number of doses, the time span between doses, and even the total daily dosage of drugs during the month of Ramadan, often without seeking any medical advice. Recommendations are not easy to make as the reliability of the available results remains questionable. In fact, most of the studies carried out during Ramadan were retrospective, and small samples were often used. Other methodological errors were also seen, such as incomplete descriptions of the therapeutic schemes observed before and during Ramadan. In order to make an objective comparison of the results obtained before and during the month of Ramadan, the administered doses, the number of daily doses, and the administration times need to be shown for the two periods studied. For patients with chronic diseases, the new dosage regimen to be used during Ramadan needs to be established beforehand. Patients must also be informed about when they should take their drugs (before, during, or after food intake), particularly when they are treated with drugs of which the absorption could be impaired by food intake.
The best reference period for comparison with Ramadan would be the period before Ramadan rather than that immediately afterwards. Ramadan is characterised by repeated fasting and altered life habits that last four weeks, and its influence on chronobiological parameters can last beyond the end of the month of Ramadan.
The choice of drugs to be studied during Ramadan could be determined by surveys evaluating the therapeutic problems encountered during this month of fasting. Focus should be on drugs for chronic diseases, and especially on those with a narrow therapeutic index. Wide dissemination of research results, as well as achievement of consensus on relevant clinical and therapeutic issues, would allow health professionals throughout the Muslim world, and in countries with an important Muslim population, to provide accurate and standardised advice on the appropriate use of drugs during the holy month of Ramadan.
|
Contributors: NA had the original idea for the article. All three authors contributed to the literature search. NA and IEH wrote the review. NA is the guarantor.
Competing interests: None declared.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.