Intended for healthcare professionals

Letters Regulation of medical devices

Triad in neuropathy from metal on metal hips

BMJ 2011; 342 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3536 (Published 07 June 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d3536
  1. Daniel A Shaerf, specialist registrar1,
  2. Bhupinder S Mann, specialist registrar1
  1. 1Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK
  1. shaerf{at}gmail.com

The review of the controversy surrounding the articular surface replacement hip prosthesis is timely.1 Such metal on metal prostheses have become popular over the past decade and are now present in many patients who visit their GP for other reasons. At our specialist hospital we have seen many patients with unexpected complications from such prostheses.

It became apparent that many patients came to us by a very convoluted route. Many patients had no pain around their hip but had both central and peripheral neuropathies. The mechanism behind neuropathy is poorly understood but may involve direct neurotoxicity, pressure effects of wear debris, or hypersensitivity reactions.2 3 4 Patients were often referred to us by local neurologists after extensive investigations that took weeks or months.

Delays in presentation undoubtedly lead to a poorer outcome. We have therefore developed a simple diagnostic triad to help recognise the metal on metal bearing as a possible cause of unexplained neurological pathology. This triad consists of:

  • Unexplained neurology

  • Raised serum cobalt or chromium ion concentrations (or both)

  • The presence of a metal bearing hip prosthesis.

If all three factors are present, urgently refer the patient to a specialist orthopaedic surgeon for further investigation and consideration of exchange arthroplasty.

Notes

Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d3536

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

View Abstract

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription