Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 28 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4365
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4365
Philip Sedgwick, senior lecturer in medical statistics
1 Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education, St Georges, University of London, Tooting, London SW17 0RE
p.sedgwick{at}sgul.ac.uk
A study investigated the performance of the CAGE questionnaire as a screening tool for alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency in primary care. The CAGE questionnaire consists of four questions about alcohol behaviour, each with a "yes" or "no" response. Clinical interview was used as the diagnostic test ("gold standard") for alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency. A total of 1970 individuals were investigated and the results obtained are shown in table 1.
1
|
1) to two or more (
2) "yes" responses, which of the following, if any, would be observed?
a—Answer a is true. Sensitivity describes the accuracy of the CAGE questionnaire in correctly identifying individuals who have a clinical diagnosis of alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency. Sensitivity is the percentage of the 175 individuals with diagnosed alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency correctly identified by the CAGE questionnaire as screen "positive."
The previous table has been re-organised to show screen "positive" thresholds of either one or more (
1) "yes" responses
and two or more (
2) "yes" responses.
|
|
1) "yes" responses, the sensitivity would be (107÷175)x100=61.1%. If the threshold for screen "positive" were increased to two or more (
2) "yes" responses, the sensitivity would be (80÷175)x100=45.7%. By increasing the threshold of the number of "yes" responses, the number of individuals with diagnosed alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency correctly identified by screening reduced, thereby reducing sensitivity.
Answer b is false. Specificity describes the accuracy of the CAGE questionnaire in correctly identifying individuals who have not been diagnosed with alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency. Specificity is the percentage of the 1795 individuals without diagnosed alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency correctly identified by the CAGE questionnaire as screen "negative." If the threshold for screen "positive" were one or more "yes" responses, the specificity would be (1560÷1795)x100=86.9%. If the threshold for screen "positive" were increased to two or more (
2) "yes" responses, the specificity would be (1700÷1795)x100=94.7%. By increasing the threshold of the number of "yes" responses, the number of individuals without diagnosed alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency correctly identified by screening increased, thereby increasing specificity.
Answer c is false. A "true positive" is someone with diagnosed alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency identified correctly by the screening questionnaire as screen "positive." If the threshold for screen "positive" increased from one or more "yes" responses to two or more, the frequency of "true positives" would decrease.
Answer d is false. A "false positive" is someone without diagnosed alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency incorrectly identified by the screening questionnaire with a screen "positive" result. If the threshold for screen "positive" increased from one or more "yes" responses to two or more, the frequency of "false positives" would decrease.
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4365