Published 8 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4125
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4125

Editor's Choice

The science and art of medicine

Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ

fgodlee{at}bmj.com

Last week’s BMJ cast yet further doubt on prostate specific antigen as a screening tool for prostate cancer (2009;339:b3572, b3537, b3601), and this week we warm to the theme of tumour markers and their limitations. The Clinical Review (doi:10.1136/bmj.b3527) and the Practice article on rational testing (doi:10.1136/bmj.b3111) make clear that tumour markers are a mixed bag, not to be used in screening, unhelpful for diagnosis in patients with non-specific symptoms, and best reserved for monitoring once a diagnosis has been made. Unfocused requests and inappropriate use of tumour markers cost health services around the world large sums of money. They provide false reassurance in some cases and cause unnecessary anxiety, investigations, and treatment in others.

The authors stress that in the right hands and in some conditions—notably germ cell tumours—tumour markers have an important role. And as options for cancer treatment improve, the next generation of predictive serum tests may identify patients most likely to benefit—the holy grail of personalised treatment already available to some extent in breast cancer care.

Also looking to the future, Menno de Jong and Rogier Sanders describe how recombinant technology may transform the way we produce flu vaccines (doi:10.1136/bmj.b4014). Using cell based platforms to produce subunits of the HA antigen would remove the need to grow vaccines in eggs, which is slow, unpredictable, difficult with some strains of virus, and (prosaically but obviously) limited by the supply of eggs. The ingenious flu virus can undergo both antigenic drift (through evolution of the HA protein) and antigenic shift (the development of pandemic strains). So it’s reassuring to hear from researchers in Mexico that last year’s seasonal flu vaccine seems to have provided some level of cross protection against H1N1, especially severe forms of the disease, during their recent epidemic (doi:10.1136/bmj.b3928).

Reassuring too that something as simple as vitamin D supplementation reduces falls in older people. Vitamin D improves muscle strength as well as bones, through a direct effect on vitamin D receptors in muscle. Trials have shown that in people at risk of vitamin D deficiency, supplementation improves strength, function, and balance in a dose related way. In their systematic review, H A Bischoff-Ferrari and colleagues identified eight randomised controlled trials of supplementation in people older than 65, and conclude that a dose of between 700 and 1000 IU per day reduces falls by about a fifth within two to five months of starting treatment (doi:10.1136/bmj.b3692). Lower doses don’t seem to be effective.

Elsewhere in this week’s journal we have a hymn to personal continuity in primary care (doi:10.1136/bmj.b3923). What Helen Richards means by this is being responsible for patients over an extended period of time, being the first point of contact in most episodes of illness, understanding the patient’s health in the context of their community, and coordinating care within a complex health system. By contrast with access to care, which is easy to measure and a vote winner, continuity is complex, hard to define, and even harder to quantify. In the current climate, this may mean it’s doomed.

Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4125


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

We must defend personal continuity in primary care
Helen Richards
BMJ 2009 339: b3923. [Extract] [Full Text]

Partial protection of seasonal trivalent inactivated vaccine against novel pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009: case-control study in Mexico City
Lourdes Garcia-Garcia, Jose Luis Valdespino-Gómez, Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Anjarath Higuera-Iglesias, Pablo Cruz-Hervert, Bulmaro Cano-Arellano, Antonio Garcia-Anaya, Elizabeth Ferreira-Guerrero, Renata Baez-Saldaña, Leticia Ferreyra-Reyes, Samuel Ponce-de-León-Rosales, Celia Alpuche-Aranda, Mario Henry Rodriguez-López, Rogelio Perez-Padilla, and Mauricio Hernandez-Avila
BMJ 2009 339: b3928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The future of influenza vaccines
Menno D de Jong and Rogier W Sanders
BMJ 2009 339: b4014. [Extract] [Full Text]

Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
H A Bischoff-Ferrari, B Dawson-Hughes, H B Staehelin, J E Orav, A E Stuck, R Theiler, J B Wong, A Egli, D P Kiel, and J Henschkowski
BMJ 2009 339: b3692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Appropriate requesting of serum tumour markers
Eric S Kilpatrick and Michael J Lind
BMJ 2009 339: b3111. [Extract] [Full Text]

Serum tumour markers: how to order and interpret them
C M Sturgeon, L C Lai, and M J Duffy
BMJ 2009 339: b3527. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

See everything: overlook a great deal: correct a little.
BM Hegde
bmj.com, 9 Oct 2009 [Full text]
Response to BM Hegde
Richard Bartley
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2009 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ