Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 9 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1203
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b1203
Identifying specific genotypes of allergy is a major breakthrough in patient care
Allergic diseases—such as asthma, rhinitis, and eczema—have been increasing worldwide over several decades, and the increase has largely been attributed to a Western lifestyle (the hygiene hypothesis). However, the exact causes of the increase are unknown. Several trigger mechanisms are probably involved, but it is still not clear whether similar triggers are responsible for the increases seen in different allergic diseases.1 In the linked systematic review (doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2433), van den Oord and Sheikh assess the association between defects of the filaggrin gene (FLG) and the risk of developing allergic sensitisation and allergic disorders.2
Allergies form a heterogeneous group of diseases in which IgE mediated reactions are the key feature, and a wide variety of symptoms can occur. Diagnosis is largely based on the history, symptoms, and detection of IgE mediated hypersensitivity, usually through skin prick testing or specific IgE determination from blood. Symptoms of allergy are non-specific in most cases because they can all be present in the absence of allergy—for example, in viral induced asthma, vasomotor rhinitis, and constitutional eczema. Moreover, skin prick testing (still the first choice test for diagnosing allergy) and determination of specific IgE have limitations, such as false positivity and false negativity. Skin prick tests and specific IgE can also be positive in healthy people in the absence of allergic symptoms. The diagnosis of allergic disease is therefore still suboptimal (especially when based on questionnaires in large epidemiological surveys) because of the limitations of current diagnostic methods.
Different underlying mechanisms and pathways probably lead to the production of allergen specific IgE across the spectrum of allergic diseases. This suggests complex genetics and the contribution of multiple genes. For decades researchers have looked for genes that might contribute to allergic diseases. Most studies have suggested that many genes with small effects, rather than few genes with strong effects, contribute to the development of allergy. Until recently, no major associations had been described, and a real "allergy gene" was elusive. However, since 2006, several studies have consistently pointed to a strong influence of one particular gene—FLG.3 4 5 6 7 8
The systemic review and meta-analysis by van den Oord and Sheikh,2 is a comprehensive summary of research into the effects of filaggrin. The review finds that FLG gene mutations significantly increase the risk of allergic sensitisation, atopic eczema, allergic rhinitis, and asthma in children with coexisting eczema.
However, FLG mutations do not account for all cases, and atopic eczema is not a monogenic disease. Instead, several genetic factors probably contribute to the complex pathophysiology of the disease.9 Different subtypes of atopic eczema—such as eczema with early onset, childhood eczema, adulthood eczema, and eczema without underlying allergy—might be based on distinct genetic constellations.
Nevertheless, it is now clear that FLG mutations are the strongest and most widely replicated genetic risk factor for eczema identified to date. The discovery that null (loss of function) mutations in the FLG gene are associated with atopic eczema and with allergic sensitisation is the most important breakthrough in understanding the genetic basis of this complex disorder. Furthermore, the defects have been linked to a specific type of allergic disease: a type of eczema with allergic sensitisation and an increased risk of rhinitis and asthma. This association has been replicated in several studies using various methods, and in populations around the globe. The next challenge is to identify all the common FLG genotypes in different ethnic groups to allow better disease stratification and optimisation of treatment.
Allergic diseases are complex, and genome-environment interactions play a key part. Distinguishing different genotypes of allergy will be a major step forward, and it could revolutionise the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of allergy in children. Because different allergy genes and genotypes elicit the IgE mediated reaction via different underlying mechanism, with different clinical manifestations and prognoses, they are likely to need a different therapeutic approach. Pharmacogenetics could be used to tailor treatment to each patient. Large and well designed prognostic clinical studies, epidemiological studies, and interventional studies will need to be conducted to translate research about the mechanisms of disease into clinical practice.
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b1203
Hugo Van Bever, professor and head of paediatric allergy, immunology, and rheumatology division1, Birgit Lane, executive director and principal investigator2, John Common, senior research fellow2
1 National University Singapore, Department of Paediatrics, 119074 Singapore , 2 Institute of Medical Biology, Agency for Science and Technology and Research, 138648 Singapore
paevbhps{at}nus.edu.sg
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read all Rapid Responses