Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 11 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a3087
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a3087
Simon W Dubrey, consultant cardiologist, Sanjay K Kohli, specialist registrar in cardiology, Paresh A Mehta, specialist registrar in cardiology, Richard Grocott-Mason, consultant cardiologist
1 Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3NN
Correspondence to: S K Kohli skkohli{at}doctors.org.uk
A 66 year old white man presented with a three year history of intermittent frequent (daily) palpitations and associated malaise, but no syncope. He was taking no drugs and had no family history of arrhythmia or of unexplained, sudden, or premature death. Clinically he was afebrile, in sinus rhythm at 60 beats/min, had blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg, and had normal heart sounds. Serum electrolytes, including magnesium, and haematology and hepatic and thyroid function tests were normal. His electrocardiogram (ECG) is shown in the figure 1
. A seven day ECG event recorder showed two episodes (of 16 and 17 hours duration) of spontaneous atrial fibrillation at rates of up to 160 beats/min. These episodes coincided with symptoms. Chest x ray and cardiac imaging were entirely normal.
|
Short answers
Long answers
Abnormalities
The ECG shows a right bundle branch block pattern in the precordial leads (C1-C3) with "coved" ST segment elevation in C1 and C2. T wave inversion in C1 and C2, together with "saddle back" ST elevation in C3, is typical of type 1 pattern of the Brugada phenotype. Type 2 and type 3 phenotypes are characterised by a saddle shaped ST segment, usually in lead C2; they are less specific and have less prognostic value in asymptomatic individuals. The QT interval is normal on this ECG.
Brugada syndrome
The likely diagnosis from these ECG features is type 1 Brugada syndrome. First described in 1992,1 the syndrome comprises ECG features of right bundle branch block and three recognised forms of ST segment elevation in the precordial chest leads.2 Brugada syndrome is an ion channel disease, inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Among patients with symptoms, the syndrome is thought to be responsible for 4-12% of all sudden cardiac deaths and for at least 20% of sudden deaths in patients with structurally normal hearts.3
Sequelae and treatments
Patients with Brugada syndrome, who have structurally normal hearts, have a propensity for sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias. The true incidence of this syndrome is unknown due to concealed forms, but it seems to be more common among South East Asians.3
In some patients the ECG is normal and will show the typical features only after challenge with certain anti-arrhythmic drugs (flecainide, ajmaline, procainamide). The associated rhythm disturbance with the syndrome is usually characterised by polymorphic ventricular tachycardia that can decay into ventricular fibrillation and sudden death.
The arrythmogenic substrate in Brugada syndrome does not seem to be confined to the ventricles.4 Atrial arrhythmias have an incidence of 6% to 38%, and spontaneous atrial fibrillation is the most common.5 6 Brugada syndrome patients with documented ventricular fibrillation have a higher incidence of spontaneous atrial fibrillation.7 8 Recent studies have shown that variants of the SCN5A gene (associated with Brugada syndrome,9 10 certain long QT syndromes, and ventricular fibrillation11) may also predispose patients to atrial fibrillation.12
In patients without symptoms whose ECG shows right bundle branch block and saddle back ST elevation, the long term prognosis seems to be good.13 14 These patients should be asked about any family history of sudden or unexplained death, as this may determine whether to recommend an implantable defibrillator. For ventricular arrhythmias, an implantable cardiac-defibrillator is currently recommended.15
The management of atrial fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome is challenging because of the potential pro-arrhythmic actions of drug. The syndrome results from mutations of the cardiac sodium channels. Most drugs prescribed to prevent atrial fibrillation will act either via these ion channels or in a way that might prolong the QT interval. At present, pulmonary vein isolation seems to be the treatment of choice, particularly in patients whose symptoms remain despite adequate rate control.16 In this case the strategy was initially rate control of the patients atrial fibrillation. Despite using two different classes of agent (verapamil and β blockers) , he remained symptomatic. He has now been referred for pulmonary vein isolation.
It is important to recognise the electrocardiographic phenotype of Brugada syndrome. This syndrome should be considered as an unusual, but ominous, cause of lone atrial fibrillation.
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a3087
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.