Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 8 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2008
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2008
Brian Greenwood, professor of tropical medicine, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Brian.Greenwood{at}lshtm.ac.uk
Brian Greenwood reviews a series of unsensational and scientific films about health in poor countries
Over the past decade interest in the health problems of the poorest countries of the world has risen remarkably. Topics such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, child survival, and maternal mortality now feature regularly at summits of the leaders of the worlds richest countries. Funds for the control of diseases of poor countries have become available on a scale never seen before.
An important and often unrecognised factor in this new interest has been the media of wealthy countries. About 10 years ago several major newspapers began publishing articles on diseases of poverty that would not normally have been considered of interest to their usual readers, and this process has accelerated. As someone who has lived through a period of neglect of diseases of the developing world I still find it surprising and gratifying to see a well written article on malaria or tuberculosis on the front page of one of Britains national newspapers.
Television has also played a key role in advocacy. In the past few years BBC World has produced a series of excellent programmes, made by Rockhopper TV, in a series called Kill or Cure. These films have looked at many of the health problems of people in the developing world and have shown what is being done to tackle them. A new series of programmes, called Survival, is now being produced for BBC World by the same company.
The series of eight programmes, produced by Alex Seaborne, covers a variety of topics on health in developing countries, with a common focus on how affected communities are tackling problems.
One of the films is set in Niger, one of the worlds poorest countries, and covers mass administration of drugs to prevent schistosomiasis, filariasis, helminthiasis, and trachoma by community health workers, using drugs donated by several of the worlds major drug companies.
|
Another beautifully photographed film deals with the hazards of healthcare delivery in a rural area of Bangladesh, where access to skilled maternal health services is difficult. It contrasts the case of a young woman who is forced to rely on the caring but unsafe practices of a traditional birth attendant with that of another young woman, who is attended throughout her pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum period by a community midwife who has the skills and training needed to reduce the risks of pregnancy in an area far from a major referral centre.
Solving the health problems of the developing world will take time. A recurring fear for those of us whose job it is to help this process is that the political will and financial support needed to continue the progress that has been made will evaporate before the job is done. This must not be allowed to happen—and a key factor is making such an outcome unacceptable to the voters of the countries that are rich enough to provide the necessary support. High quality, scientifically accurate, and unsensational films like these show what can be achieved by people in poor countries, with a little outside help, and will help ensure that there will be no backsliding by our political leaders.
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2008
Eight episodes from 4 October to 29 November 2008
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?