Published 24 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a953
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a953

Editor's Choice

The world is watching the English experiment

It may seem parochial for the BMJ to use so much space discussing the NHS—and the English NHS at that. But I make no apologies—firstly, because if doctors are to take the lead in health care, as they must and as they are being encouraged to do, they need to understand the systems that deliver it. Secondly, because the wider world is watching what may come to be known as the English experiment. As evidence of this, the New England Journal of Medicine has published another paper on England’s use of quality indicators and performance payments. As Alison Tonks describes it (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a891), the paper from Martin Roland’s group in Manchester finds that GPs’ professionalism outweighs temptations to game the system. To minimise overtreatment, GPs are allowed to exclude clinically inappropriate patients from target calculations, but rates of such "exception reporting" among English general practices were low. I find this very encouraging.

More worrying is the effect of targets in other areas of medicine. In a personal view Nigel Rawlinson describes how the four hour target for processing patients through emergency departments has meant that, however hard they try to remain patient focused, good staff will now "treat the clock not the patient." He warns that a two hour target is proposed (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39604.711146.47).

Such politically driven initiatives are part of the problem outlined by Donald Light as he gives his verdict on the new strategic plan for the NHS—the Darzi report (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a824). Light, a long time observer of the US and UK health systems, condemns "the continued and costly pattern of ‘redisorganisation’ caused by too many changes not well thought out." Compared with this constant politically driven change, the clinical leadership of the US Veterans Health Administration took 10 years to implement one carefully designed plan that has transformed the service. Light predicts that the nearly £1bn that is being wasted on unevaluated reorganisation in the UK will result in comprehensive free care being declared unaffordable, requiring patients to pay fees for services and drugs.

This would take us inexorably closer to the US model, a fate that another experienced observer of the US and UK health systems, Don Berwick, warns roundly against. Berwick asks us to celebrate the ambition of the NHS (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a838). His 10 suggestions for making it even better include "stop restructuring . . . reinvest in general practice and primary care . . . please don’t put your faith in market forces" and "avoid supply driven care like the plague." As if to hammer home the point, a report published last week from the New York based Commonwealth Fund has ranked the US last among 19 industrialised countries across a range of healthcare indictors, the worst of which, and getting worse, was access to care (doi: 10.1136/bmj.a889). The report concluded that much of the problem stemmed from having a weak base of primary care doctors.

So let’s hold ourselves to a vision of health care that evolves organically rather than through constant political dabbling; that supports professionalism, is clinically led, and has strong primary care at its heart.

Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a953

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Ethics of PCT decision making on funding cancer treatments

Timothy S Maughan and Joanne Rule
BMJ 2008 337: a1243. [Extract] [Full Text]

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2008 337: a891. [Full Text]

Health care in US ranks lowest among developed countries

Bob Roehr
BMJ 2008 337: a889. [Extract] [Full Text]

Will the NHS strategic plan benefit patients?

Donald W Light
BMJ 2008 337: a824. [Extract] [Full Text]

A transatlantic review of the NHS at 60

Donald M Berwick
BMJ 2008 337: a838. [Extract] [Full Text]

Harms of target driven health care

Nigel Rawlinson
BMJ 2008 337: a885. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Maughan, T. S, Rule, J. (2008). Ethics of PCT decision making on funding cancer treatments. BMJ 337: a1243-a1243 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

As Doctors, What Are We Expected To Do?

Kadiyali M Srivatsa
bmj.com, 29 Jul 2008 [Full text]

The ethics of PCT decision-making on funding of cancer treatments

Timothy S Maughan, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2008 [Full text]

Cancer Waiting Times

Edward J Fitzsimons
bmj.com, 31 Jul 2008 [Full text]

The World has turned its back on the "English experiment"

Taiyyab Mehmood
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2008 [Full text]

Treating the clock, NOT the patient compromises patient safety

Syed Ishaq Husain, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Aug 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>