Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 9 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a747
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a747
Our attention has been drawn to an inaccuracy in this Feature article published by the BMJ on 25 August 2007 (BMJ 2007;335:370-3 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39304.486146.AD).
The inaccuracy appears in the sentence that reads: "Although Professor Ottosson felt that some of Professor Kärfves criticisms were unjustified and sometimes based on misunderstanding, and that the tone of Brain Ghosts was confrontational and insinuating, both men agreed that the book was polemical criticism rather than research and that, therefore, Professor Kärfve could not be guilty of breaching good research practice."
We wish to make it clear that, while the Swedish Research Council expressed no view, both Professor Vagero and Professor Ottosson reported that many, but not all, of Professor Kärfves criticisms of the research performed by Professor Gillberg and his team were justified. Furthermore, neither Professor Vagero nor Professor Ottosson criticised Professor Kärfves own research as presented in the book nor did they conclude that the three passages that they were asked to examine from Professor Karfves book constituted scientific misconduct.
We apologise for any misunderstanding that has arisen.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?