Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:539-542 (8 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39475.603935.25 (published 14 February 2008)
Lucy Biddle, research fellow1, Anita Brock, senior research officer, mortality statistics2, Sara T Brookes, senior lecturer in medical statistics1, David Gunnell, professor of epidemiology1
1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, 2 Office for National Statistics, London SW1V 2QQ
Correspondence to: D Gunnell D.J.Gunnell{at}bristol.ac.uk
Design Time trend analysis.
Setting England and Wales, 1968-2005.
Population Men and women aged 15-34 years.
Results Since the 1990s, rates of suicide in young men have declined steadily and by 2005 they were at their lowest level for almost 30 years. This decline is partly because of a reduction in poisoning with car exhaust gas as an increased number of cars have catalytic converters; but there have been declines in suicides from all common methods, including hanging, suggesting a more pervasive effect. Other risk factors for suicide, such as unemployment and divorce, have also decreased. Possible recent reductions in alcohol use among young men and increases in prescribing of antidepressants do not seem to be temporally related to the decline in suicide.
Conclusions Suicide rates in young men have declined markedly in the past 10 years in England and Wales. Reductions in key risk factors for suicide, such as unemployment, might be contributing to lower rates.
The cause for these rises is uncertain, though time series data show parallel increases in a range of risk factors including unemployment, divorce, substance misuse, and income inequality.2 Furthermore, changes in the availability and use of common methods of suicide, particularly domestic gas, barbiturates, and motor vehicle exhaust gases, have had an important impact on suicide rates and trends in the past 50 years.5 6 7
There is a popular notion that rates of suicide in young people have continued to rise. A sharp downward trend in suicide in young men, however, has been reported in Australia,8 and preliminary data suggest similar findings in England and Wales.3 We explored recent trends in overall suicide, suicide by specific methods, and risk factors for suicide among young people.
Three successive revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-8 to ICD-10) covered the period examined. Previous analysis has shown that there is no impact on the total number of suicides between revisions,3 but there are differences in how method of injury is classified. We identified seven consistently coded methods of suicide: poisoning by solid or liquid (including drug poisoning); other poisoning (including domestic gas supply and vehicle exhaust); hanging (including suffocation); drowning; firearms (including explosives); jumping; and other (including injury from sharp object) (see table A on bmj.com). We also analysed trends in deaths recorded as accidental poisonings (ICD-8 E850-E877; ICD-9 E850-E869; ICD-10 X40-X49) to investigate whether any decreases in suicide rates might be attributable to changes in coroners recording practices rather than changes in the incidence of suicide; verdicts of "accidental death" are the most likely alternative to suicide or open verdicts.
We used age specific population estimates for England and Wales for the years 1968-2005 to calculate rates and the most up to date populations revised to take account of the 2001 census. The main analysis plotted trends in overall rates and rates for specific methods for men and women aged 15-24 and 25-34 separately. Time series data specific for age and sex for divorce and unemployment (www.statistics.gov.uk/), self reported data on alcohol use from the general household survey,11 and UK data on antidepressant prescribing (selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, tricyclics, and other related antidepressants) from IMS Health (Intercontinental Medical Statistics) (http://research.imshealth.com/contactus.htm) were also obtained and plotted. These were compared with patterns in suicide to identify possible associations. Age groups could not be matched exactly. Unemployment data were not available for those aged 16 and 17, alcohol data were available only for those aged 16-24 and 25-44, and prescribing data were available for those aged 20-29.
Continuous data series were not available for a sufficient time period to enable us to undertake a full multivariable time series analysis. To crudely assess associations of changing levels of risk factors with suicide rates we calculated correlations between differences in suicide and difference in levels in consecutive years. This approach takes account of the well known problem with time series data—serial autocorrelation (non-independence) of data from consecutive years.
|
Suicide trends in young women
Suicide rates in young women have shown more stability over time (fig 1).
Rates in the 21st century, however, are at the lowest recorded over the time period analysed. Suicide by hanging has increased among young women since the mid-1990s and in recent years has overtaken self poisoning as the most common method. In 1968, deaths by hanging accounted for just 5.7% of suicides in women aged 15-34. In 2005 this proportion was 47.3%. The corresponding proportions of self poisoning with solids or liquids were 64.1% in 1968 and 35.5% in 2005.
Accidental poisonings
From 1968 to 2005 rates of accidental poisoning in young men show a parallel pattern to that of overall suicide rates over the same period. In 15-24 year old men rates declined from a peak of 5.1 per 100 000 in 1997 to 1.9 per 100 000 by 2005; in 25-34 year old men rates peaked in 1996 (7.1 per 100 000) and declined to 5.5 per 100 000 by 2005 (see fig A on bmj.com). This provides some evidence that the recent downward trend in rates is not because of an increased use of accidental verdicts by coroners.
Risk factors: divorce, unemployment, alcohol use, and antidepressants
With the exception of the marked increase in divorces in 1972 after the Divorce Reform Act 1969 came into effect, rates of divorce closely followed trends in suicide in young men at the end of the 20th century. Both increased into the 1990s and then showed a decline up to 2001 (fig 2)
. Unlike the trends seen for suicide, however, divorce rates increased from 2001 to 2004 but have since fallen once more. Continuous time series data, specific for age and sex, were not readily available for unemployment and alcohol consumption before the 1990s. Published data show that unemployment rose steeply in the early 1980s and then showed a period of decline before rising again and peaking in the early 1990s.2 Recent age specific data show that unemployment rates also show a decline in parallel with declining suicide rates (fig 2), although the decline preceded the decline in suicide by several years and ceased in 2000.
Data from the general household survey indicate that an upward trend in alcohol consumption throughout the 1990s may have peaked early in the 21st century with recent declines postdating declining rates of suicide (fig 2).
|
|
Strengths and limitations
To investigate possible explanations for the recent decline in suicide young men in England and Wales we used the most up to date national data on suicide and possible contributory factors. Nevertheless, there are several limitations to our analysis. Firstly, while changes in known risk factors may contribute to variations in suicide rates, such trends should be interpreted cautiously in aggregate (ecological) analyses of population data as causality cannot be proved. Secondly, age specific data on relevant risk factors span too few years to enable a multivariable time series analysis of factors independently associated with recent trends. Thirdly, age specific data on unemployment and alcohol consumption spanning the entire period of our analysis were not available. Furthermore we did not have secular trend data on two key risk factors for suicide: mental illness and self harm. It is noteworthy, however, that data from Oxford12 indicate that after peaking in 1994-5 rates of self harm in men aged 15-24 and 25-34 decreased by around 40% by 2005, a pattern in keeping with that seen in our analysis of suicide trends. Lastly, interpretation of time trends in divorce is problematic. The appropriate denominator for examining such trends is the number of married individuals, but recent declines in marriage mean that the population at risk has also declined. From 2001 to 2005 less than 20% of young men aged 16-34 were married (www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=9535) and divorce rates do not take into account the larger proportion of young men who cohabit and subsequently separate from their partner. Declines in divorce rates may therefore signal either a general increase in the stability of relationships or a selection into marriage of people who are the least likely to divorce.
Previous studies
The reductions in suicides in young men corresponded to periods of decline in three risk factors for suicide—unemployment, divorce, and alcohol consumption—and an increase in antidepressant prescribing, although rates of decline in unemployment have since levelled off and divorce rates increased in 2002-4 (fig 2).
The impact on suicide of declining alcohol consumption is also uncertain as the reductions postdated the decrease in suicide. In addition, as the alcohol data are self reported, changes may be caused by an increased reluctance among young people to report heavy drinking.11 Furthermore, although alcohol related mortality in men aged 15-34 peaked in 2001, rates remain higher than those recorded before substantial rises in the 1990s and figures show that young men continue to drink to excess.13 14 Prescribing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased rapidly from the early 1990s but the increases did not correspond to the timing of the declines in suicide. Furthermore, there is uncertainty regarding whether these rises have had a beneficial impact on suicide rates,15 and any such effects may be stronger in older than in younger adults.2 16
Other possible influences on secular trends in suicide are changes in income inequality and the prevalence of substance misuse.2 Income inequality fell from 2000-1 to 2004-5 (www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=332), but these falls were slight and postdated the decline in suicide. There are no reliable data on time trends in the incidence of drug misuse. Trends in mortality related to drug misuse (only 20% of which are suicides), however, indicate that after year on year rises throughout the 1990s, deaths in men decreased by over 20% in 2001-4. This decline was most pronounced in those aged 20-39.17
The possible association between declining rates of suicide and unemployment is contrary to the results of an analysis of similar declines in men in Australia.8 This found a break in the association between unemployment and suicide and the authors instead attribute reductions to a major government strategy to prevent suicide in young people. The major policy initiatives on suicide prevention in England and Wales have been government targets for suicide reduction, first set in 1992 (the Health of the Nation white paper18) and, in 2002, the launch of National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England.10 The period of increased policy focus on suicide has been associated with the levelling off and subsequent declines in suicide, although it is not possible to determine causality.
Just as no single factor was clearly associated with the rise in suicide in young men in the 1950s-1990s,2 favourable changes in several different factors—levels of employment, substance misuse, and antidepressant prescribing as well as policy focus on suicide and vehicle exhaust gas legislation—may have contributed to the recent reductions in England and Wales. It is also possible that the reductions in several factors, including suicide, relate to some broader societal change not captured in this analysis.
|
Contributors: LB and DG had the idea for the study and developed the study hypotheses. LB and AB identified relevant data sources and collated the data. LB and STB summarised and plotted the data. LB wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors contributed to revising the paper for intellectual content and approved the final draft. LB and DG are guarantors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not required.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+