Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:292 (9 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39479.508530.3A
It goes without saying that climate change will have a dramatic impact on health—personal, global, and planetary. Yet I disagree that climate change is the defining issue for public health in the 21st century.1
What can be done to promote sustainable population growth? Reducing poverty, eliminating gender inequalities, and increasing access to education and family planning are essential. The diversity of these endeavours teaches us about the need to employ a multidisciplinary perspective when addressing population growth. Failure to achieve sustainable population growth by concerted action will lead to population policies such as those implemented by China. The one child per family policy, draconian though it was, resulted in 400 million fewer people in a country whose current economic growth (driven in large part by the needs of the 1.3 billion people currently living in China) is causing enormous environmental harm. Had the one child per family policy not been implemented, one can only imagine the greater negative impact that 400 million additional people in China would have had on individual health and on the environment (and not just in China: pollutants released into the atmosphere by coal burning plants in China travel around the world).
Gerry Silverstein, emeritus lecturer in health sciences
1 University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
gsilvers{at}uvm.edu