Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:1201 (9 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39167.459028.DE (published 27 April 2007)
Ian Jones, research officer1, Richard Whitfield, R & D lead officer1, Michael Colquhoun, senior lecturer in prehospital care2, Douglas Chamberlain, honorary professor of resuscitation medicine2, Norman Vetter, reader in public health and epidemiology3, Robert Newcombe, professor of medical statistics3
1 Prehospital Emergency Research Unit, Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust/Cardiff University, Wales School of Medicine, Cardiff CF11 8PL, 2 Prehospital Emergency Research Unit, Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust/Cardiff University, Cardiff, and Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff CF14 4XN, 3 Department of Epidemiology, Statistics and Public Health, Cardiff University, Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4YS
Correspondence to: M Colquhoun, Prehospital Emergency Research Unit, Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust/Cardiff University, Cardiff CF11 8PL mcc{at}mcolquhoun.plus.com
Design Observational study.
Setting Four schools in Cardiff.
Participants 157 children aged 9-14 years in three school year groups (ages 9-10, 11-12, and 13-14).
Interventions Participants were taught basic life support skills in one lesson lasting 20 minutes.
Main outcome measure Effectiveness of chest compression during three minutes' continuous chest compression on a manikin.
Results No year 5 pupil (age 9-10) was able to compress the manikin's chest to the depth recommended in guidelines (38-51 mm). 19% of pupils in year 7 (age 11-12) and 45% in year 9 (age 13-14) achieved adequate compression depth. Only the 13-14 year olds performed chest compression as well as adults in other reported studies. Compression depth showed a significant relation with children's age, weight, and height (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that, if the age and weight of the children were both known, the height (which is closely related to both) was no longer significant (P=0.95). No association was found between pupils' age, sex, weight, or height and the average rate of chest compressions over the three minute period. Similarly, no relation was found between year group and ability to place the hands in the correct position. During the three minutes' compression, compression rate increased and depth decreased.
Conclusions The children's ability to achieve an adequate depth of chest compression depended on their age and weight. The ability to provide the correct rate and to employ the correct hand position was similar across all the age ranges tested. Young children who are not yet physically able to compress the chest can learn the principles of chest compression as well as older children.
Studies of skill acquisition have concentrated on older children.3 4 9 No study reports when children are capable of the more physically demanding tasks, particularly chest compression. Recommended ages vary from 9 to 13.8 This study investigated when children can provide effective chest compressions.
Training
Chest compressions were taught on a Laerdal Little Anne training manikin according to Heartstart UK schools training programme level 3 skill card 7a.10 Each child attended one training session lasting 20 minutes and was assessed within one hour of being trained. Each class consisted of four pupils and an instructor, with each pupil and the instructor having an individual training manikin.
Skills assessment
Children performed continuous chest compressions on a Laerdal Resusci Anne SkillReporter manikin for three minutes. The time remaining was announced every 30 seconds; no other audio or visual feedback was provided during the assessment.
Compression rate and depth and percentage with correct hand position were recorded with Laerdal PC SkillReporter software version 2.0. The software produced averages for compression rate and depth for the three minute assessment, and averages for each minute were calculated with software tools. Correct compression depth and rate were defined as 38-51 mm and 90-110 per minute.
Statistical analysis
To investigate associations between variables, we used parametric (Pearson) correlations, bivariate and multivariate linear regression, t tests, and
2 tests.
The power calculation was based on a median of 82 satisfactory chest compressions (interquartile range 55-100) that had been achieved by adults on similar manikins.10 Applying this average to the mean rate achieved by children aged 13-14, we constructed a standard deviation of 33.4 from the interquartile range. Assuming the mean reduces by 30% at age 9-10 to 57.4 (SD 33.4), we calculated that 30 children in each age group would provide an 80% power to detect such a difference (
5%). The power to show that children aged 11-12 differ from either of the other groups is lower, and in practice we recruited larger numbers.
|
|
|
Compression depthAdequate depth was achieved by no pupils in year 5, 19% in year 7, and 45% in year 9. The compression depth showed significant association with the pupils' age, weight, and height (P<0.001). However, multivariate analyses showed that, once age and weight were known, height (closely related to both) was no longer significantly associated (P=0.95). The mean compression depth decreased in successive minutes in all groups as compression rate increased, but the inverse relation between the two was not significant (r=0.07, P=0.39).
Hand positionNo relation existed between pupils' age and the proportion achieving correct hand position. Correct hand placement for 100% of compressions was achieved by 40% of pupils in year 5, 22% in year 7, and 31% in year 9. For 80-100% correct, the corresponding figures were 58%, 46%, and 52%.
Comparison with other studies
Previous studies in schoolchildren have tested factual knowledge with questionnaires and assessed practical skills with manikins.3 4 9 Studies assessing practical ability have concentrated on older children and teenagers. Few assessed performance of chest compressions, concentrating instead on airway and breathing skills.16 Van Kerschaver assessed hand position and compression rate in children aged 12 years and older but did not report compression depth.3 Lester reported that children aged 11-12 often failed to compress the chest adequately, but did not report quantitative data.17
Compression depth declined in successive minutes, as in some adult studies, which have shown a decline in compression quality with time.10 18 19
Limitations of study
A manikin may offer greater or lesser resistance than a real casualty. Emotional factors in real life resuscitation may also affect performance. Quality of compression beyond three minutes was not assessed. Compressions given in cycles alternating with rescue breaths might be less accurate than continuous compressions.
Conclusions
In our study, children aged 9-10 years used the correct hand position and same compression rate as older children. Although they were not able to compress the chest sufficiently, they learnt the methods of performing chest compression as well as the older children. Teaching younger children provides knowledge for when they are adequately developed. They might also advise an adult or perform adequately on a chest more compliant than that of the manikin. By starting training young, revision is possible at school, with the prospect of greater skill attainment and retention.
|
Contributors: MC had the idea for the project and acts as guarantor. All authors contributed to the design of the project. IJ and RW carried out the study and collected the data. Data processing was by IJ and RN. IJ and MC wrote the first drafts of the paper; all authors contributed to the final version.
Funding: The study was funded by a grant from the British Heart Foundation. None of the authors receive payment or other financial incentive from the funding body. No pharmaceutical company was involved. There was no financial involvement by any medical equipment company.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Dyfed Powys Local Research Ethics Committee approved the study.
Read all Rapid Responses