Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:863-864 (28 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39191.711794.3A
Discussions around regulatory frameworks in commercial sex require careful useof terminology. A widely circulated report of the BMA's annual public health conference seems to be advocating the legalisation and regulation of sex work in order to submit prostitutes to regular testing.1 2 This approach is not only unjustified, and an affront to human dignity and rights, but an inappropriate diversion of scarce NHS resources. Furthermore, it would be ineffective and dangerous.3 Coercion of sex workers merely drives them further underground and alienates them from the services they need, leading to a breakdown in sexual health practices, and an increase in sexually transmitted infections.4
The major health problems among sex workers are related to stigmatisation, to which this report contributes further.1 Inaccurate and inflammatory statements such as these reported comments are likely to lead to increased levels of violence against them, as seen recently in Ipswich, and will even place outreach workers at risk.
It is unfortunate that Spencer Jones's statements are being attributed to the BMA, giving them an undeserved authority, and hence credibility. They do not reflect BMA policy,5 and the BMA needs to clarify this with some urgency, look to its accountability, and return to evidence based practice.
Michael D E Goodyear, assistant professor
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 2Y9
mgoodyear{at}dal.ca