BMJ  2007;334:437-438 (3 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39114.354248.80

Editorials

Management of breast cancer in women with BRCA gene mutation

Breast conservation surgery is safe in selected women when combined with adjuvant therapy

Germline mutation may account for up to 10% of breast cancers.1 Known mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for about 45% of breast cancer susceptibility syndromes (genetic abnormalities that put patients at high risk of developing breast cancer), which are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern.1 Variants of the BRCA genes increase the overall risk of developing breast cancer and are also associated with a high risk of early onset breast cancer.

Once BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has been confirmed, preventative strategies include bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and intensive screening with possible hormonal manipulation. Although prevention of primary breast cancer with mastectomy reduces the risk of breast cancer by 89.5-100%, understandably it is unacceptable to many women.23 This is because it has a negative impact on self image, it involves major surgery, it cannot remove all risk, and patients may find it hard to accept its theoretical benefit as not all carriers develop breast cancer.

For women with breast cancer unrelated to BRCA ("sporadic breast cancer"), breast conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy is used where appropriate and is now regarded as the standard of care.4 Conceptually, breast conserving surgery may seem unwise in women with BRCA related breast cancer because of the potential risk of in-breast tumour recurrence. After more than a decade of research the optimal local treatment for these women remains a source of contention.

The largest series to date examined breast conserving surgery in 160 women with BRCA mutation and found a 10 year in-breast tumour recurrence of 12%.5 In women with sporadic breast cancer, the cumulative 10 year in-breast tumour recurrence in five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project trials was 8.7%.6 The risk in women with BRCA mutation is therefore slightly higher than in women without, though it seems to be acceptable, as previous trials in women with sporadic breast cancer have reported in-breast tumour recurrence between 10% and 15% at 10 years. Furthermore, when women with BRCA related breast cancer were compared retrospectively with age matched controls with sporadic breast cancer, no significant difference was found in the risk of in-breast tumour recurrence, provided the women with BRCA related breast cancer had undergone bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy.5 However, women with BRCA mutation who did not have prophylactic oophorectomy had twice the rate of in-breast tumour recurrence relative to controls.5

Although the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA mutation is much lower than the risk of breast cancer, bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy reduces the risk of a new breast cancer as a result of hormone deprivation.7 Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces the risk of breast cancer by about 70% in women with BRCA mutation, and short term hormone replacement therapy after surgery does not seem to negate this protective effect.8

Apart from an increased risk of in-breast tumour recurrence, women with BRCA mutation who have breast conserving surgery also have a greater incidence of new primary tumours in the contralateral breast than women with sporadic breast cancer (42% v 9% at 12 years).9 Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy combined with tamoxifen reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer by as much as 50% in women with BRCA mutation, supporting hormonal intervention.5 Tamoxifen reduces the risk of in-breast tumour recurrence in these women, and this protective effect increases with the duration of treatment (up to four years).10

The only specific BRCA chemoprevention studies have been small single centre trials. Several randomised controlled trials have assessed tamoxifen as a chemoprevention strategy in high risk patients, however, and post randomisation analysis of those with BRCA mutation has shown tamoxifen to be up to 50% effective in preventing breast cancer in these patients.11 In addition, tamoxifen can reduce the incidence of a second primary cancer by 50% in women with BRCA mutation.11

So what does all this mean for patients and the clinicians advising them? Overall, the evidence indicates that breast conservation is safe in selected women with BRCA related cancers when combined with optimal adjuvant therapy.4 Recent data show that women who have breast conserving surgery rather than mastectomy for breast cancer score higher on quality of life measures, and these findings are probably applicable to women with BRCA mutation.12 However, women with BRCA related breast cancer should be informed of the relative risks and benefits of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy compared with breast conservation so they can be supported in making their own decisions.

Malcolm R Kell, consultant surgeon and senior lecturer, John P Burke, research registrar

Eccles Breast Screening Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin 7, Ireland

malcolm.kell{at}breastcheck.ie


Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Non-commissioned, externally peer reviewed.

References

  1. Wooster R, Weber BL. Breast and ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2339-47.[Free Full Text]
  2. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:77-84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Collins FS. BRCA1—lots of mutations, lots of dilemmas. N Engl J Med 1996;334:186-8.[Free Full Text]
  4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Pierce LJ, Levin AM, Rebbeck TR, Ben-David MA, Friedman E, Solin LJ, et al. Ten-year multi-institutional results of breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy in BRCA1/2-associated stage I/II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2437-43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, Geyer CE Jr, Jeong JH, Tan-Chiu E, et al. Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2028-37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1609-15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Wagner T, Lynch HT, Garber JE, Daly MB, et al. Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk reduction after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7804-10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Haffty BG, Harrold E, Khan AJ, Pathare P, Smith TE, Turner BC, et al. Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet 2002;359:1471-7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Narod SA, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Robson M, Heimdal K, Neuhausen SL, et al. Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. Lancet 2000;356:1876-81.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Calderon-Margalit R, Paltiel O. Prevention of breast cancer in women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a critical review of the literature. Int J Cancer 2004;112:357-64.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, Fagerlin A, Salem B, Morrow M, et al. Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1467-79.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The Harms of Risks
Tom J Cawood, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Mar 2007 [Full text]
Title: Management of BRCA-related gynaecological cancer risks
Louise P Izatt, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Mar 2007 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview