Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:328 (17 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39121.866238.1F
With an evidence based approach, Farquhar reviews the most outstanding aspects of endometriosis.1 Nevertheless, we were left with the impression that some important issues are in need of further clarification.
A systematic review has shown an improvement in pregnancy rates after laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis for women with infertility,2 but it is important to outline that, at the moment, this improvement seems to be true only for mild or minimal endometriosis and its effect on more advanced stages remains uncertain.34
A recurrence of endometriosis does not inevitably mean further surgery. The evidence supporting systematic surgery for asymptomatic endometriosis is poor, and it has been suggested that re-operation is not always indicated for recurrent endometriosis. Transvaginal aspiration might prove to be a reasonable alternative for some patients to reduce impact on ovarian reserve as well as other potential surgical complications associated with re-operation.3
Whether endometriosis affects outcomes in the context of artificial reproductive techniques is still under debate,3 it has been proved in a recent systematic review that down-regulation with GnRH agonists for three to six months before starting in vitro fertilisation quadruples the odds of clinical pregnancy.5 Early referral to centres of excellence and early treatment of infertility should always be considered in these patients.3
Alejandro Chavez-Badiola, Andrew J Drakeley, subspecialist consultant in reproductive medicine
Hewitt Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Liverpool Women's Hospital. Liverpool L8 7SS
alejandro_bad{at}yahoo.it