BMJ  2007;334:231 (3 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.334.7587.231-a

News

Shortcuts from other journals

Antibodies to myelin don't predict progression to multiple sclerosis


Figure 4
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
 
It's hard to predict what will happen to patients who present with a first neurological episode suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Some will recover, whereas others will progress to the full blown clinical disease. An accurate prognostic test would be a real benefit to patients, and antimyelin antibodies looked like a good candidate because antibody mediated demyelination is thought to have a role in this disease. The latest research has been disappointing, however. The presence or absence of two antimyelin antibodies failed to predict outcome for 462 patients taking part in a trial of interferon beta-1bGo.

All participants had experienced just one neurological episode. They also had clinically silent but suggestive changes on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. No significant associations were found between the presence of the two antibodies (antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and myelin based protein (MBP)) and patients' progress over two years. Just under a third of patients developed clinically definite multiple sclerosis, regardless of their antibody status at baseline. The authors found no link between the antibodies and progression in any subgroup of patients, including those given steroids or those randomised to the active or control arms of the interferon trial. These antibodies are unlikely to provide useful diagnostic tests for patients with early disease, say the authors.

References

    N Engl J Med 2007;356:371-8[Abstract/Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview