BMJ  2007;334:169 (27 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39101.389271.1F

Letters

Incident reporting

Seeing the picture through "lean thinking"

We have to take hospital safety out of the safety and quality ghetto and beyond strategies such as clinical audit and feedback that embed existing levels of error into baseline best practice outcomes.1

For the past three years we have been experimenting with the application of "lean thinking" to care processes across our teaching general hospital.2 Lean thinking is an approach to improving the sequential processes involved in production of manufactured goods and services of all kinds.

To the lean thinker, error in execution of a process is an absolute waste. No one benefits from it. Once it is acknowledged that errors resulting in an overt patient safety incident occur in one in five hospital admissions, further retrospective error analysis is of limited value. Simply adding another incident report to the existing pile will not change anything.3 Instead, we prospectively examine and redesign care processes of all kinds to make doing the right thing easier than making errors. A prospective examination of existing processes, to identify potential weaknesses and opportunities to improve, encourages the improvement team to work at the system level rather than the level of individual blame.4 It also avoids sterile debate about relative risk.

Over three years, we have halved the number of serious safety events that have had to be reported to our insurers, despite a substantial increase in the numbers of patients seeking care in our hospital. At the beginning of our lean thinking journey, our hospital was struggling to contain a deficit. In the last financial year, we were several millions dollars in the black accomplished without extreme measures such as shedding staff.

David I Ben-Tovim, director, Redesigning Care and Clinical Epidemiology Units

1 Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia david.ben-tovim@fmc.sa.gov.au


Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. Vincent C. Incident reporting and patient safety. BMJ 2007;334:51-2. (13 January.)[Free Full Text]
  2. Womack JP, Jones DT. Lean thinking. Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. London: Simon and Schuster, 1996.
  3. Sari AB, Sheldon TA, Cracknell A, Turnbull A. Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective case note review. BMJ 2007;334:79-81. (13 January.)[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. King DL, Ben-Tovim DI, Bassham J. Redesigning emergency department patient flows: application of Lean thinking to health care. Emerg Med Australas 2006;18:391-7.[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Incident reporting and patient safety
Charles Vincent
BMJ 2007 334: 51. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review
Ali Baba-Akbari Sari, Trevor A Sheldon, Alison Cracknell, and Alastair Turnbull
BMJ 2007 334: 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tsasis, P., Bruce-Barrett, C. (2008). Organizational change through Lean Thinking. Health Serv Manage Res 21: 192-198 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Colgate, R., Jones, S. (2007). Controlling the confusion: management of referrals into mental health services for older adults. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 13: 317-324 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Patient Safety, Audit and Proactive Risk Assesment
Allan D spigelman
bmj.com, 29 Jan 2007 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview