BMJ  2007;334:119 (20 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.334.7585.119-b

News

Shortcuts from other journals

Patients with drug eluting stents do better on long term clopidogrel


Figure 4
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
 
Drug eluting stents work well in the short term, but longer follow-up of patients with these stents suggested they were associated with an increased risk of catastrophic restenosis several years after a heart attack. No one knows exactly why. It is possible, however, that antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel could prevent restenosis if taken for long enoughGo.

In the absence of any clinical trials of extended treatment with clopidogrel, researchers looked for clues in a cohort of 4666 adults given drug eluting or bare metal stents at one specialist centre in the US. They found a significant association between long term treatment with clopidogrel (six or 12 months) and a lower risk of death over two years in patients with drug eluting stents. Patients on extended treatment also had a lower risk of death or heart attack over two years. Long term clopidogrel seemed to make no difference to patients with bare metal stents.

The authors used propensity scoring to adjust for any systematic differences between patients who stopped treatment and those who continued with clopidogrel for six or 12 months. But they and a linked editorial (pp 209-11) are still cautious about the findings, which rely on patients remembering accurately the length of their treatment.

References

    JAMA 2007;297:159-68[Abstract/Full Text] JAMA 2007;297:209-11[Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Student BMJ

Sepsis

The latest guidlines will affect how we practice medicine

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview