Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:1213 (9 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7580.1213
|
The 5472 participants were either treated continuously or treated only when their CD4 cell count fell below 250/mm3. The researchers were hoping that the "drug sparing" regimen would reduce side effects and improve adherence without compromising the overall effectiveness of treatment. It didn't work. Patients on intermittent treatment did so badly that the trial was stopped early.
During breaks in treatment, the first of which averaged around 16 months, CD4 counts fell rapidly and viral loads rose rapidly. Contrary to expectations, patients given intermittent treatment had more major cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic disease than patients treated continuously (hazard ratio 1.7 (1.1 to 2.5) for all three combined).
Intermittent treatment did not protect them from serious drug related toxicity.
It seems clear that breaks in treatment are bad for patients with chronic HIV infection, says a linked editorial (pp 2359-61). We must find other ways to make long term treatment more tolerable.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+