BMJ  2006;333:199 (22 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7560.199

Letter

Death on the roads

Article lacks logic

EDITOR—Walker et al show convincingly that drivers and other occupants of heavy four wheel drive vehicles are safer in crashes than those in smaller or lighter vehicles and those on foot or cycle.¹ They also show that drivers of these vehicles use mobile phones more often and seat belts less often than drivers of other cars.

But by conflating mobile phone use (which distracts drivers) and non-use of seat belts (which makes drivers feel less safe) as equally important examples of illegal and dangerous practices they have sown confusion and undermined the prospect of a constructive approach to road safety.

View larger version (54K): [in this window] [in a new window]

 

Using mobile phones and not using seatbelts have opposing consequences for other road users. The distraction caused by mobile phones increases the threat to others, but the non-use of seat belts decreases it. As the authors note, deaths of pedestrians, cyclists, and rear seat passengers increased (by 8%, 13%, and 28% respectively) after laws mandating the use of seat belts in front seats were introduced in the United Kingdom.

Department of Geography, University College London, London WC1E 6BT John.Adams{at}UCL.ac.uk

---

Competing interests: None declared.

References

1. Walker L, Williams J, Jamrozik K. Unsafe driving behaviour and four wheel drive vehicles: observational study. BMJ 2006;333: 71-3. (8 July.)[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Unsafe driving behaviour and four wheel drive vehicles: observational study

Lesley Walker, Jonathan Williams, and Konrad Jamrozik
BMJ 2006 333: 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]