BMJ  2006;333 (15 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7559.0-c

Improving knowledge on female genital mutilation

Studies of female genital mutilation should not rely on women's self reporting or WHO classification to define the severity of the operation, say Elmusharaf and colleagues on page 124. They assessed reports of 255 girls aged 4-9 years and of 282 women aged 17-35 years from a paediatric hospital and a gynaecological outpatient clinic in Sudan. They verified the extent of cutting with clinical examination and compared the extent with the corresponding WHO classification. They found considerable under-reporting of the extent and that the WHO classification fails to relate the defined forms of female genital mutilation to the severity of the operation.


Figure 1
Credit: SIPA/REX

 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study
Susan Elmusharaf, Nagla Elhadi, and Lars Almroth
BMJ 2006 333: 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ