BMJ  2006;333:53-54 (8 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7558.53

Editorial

Death and injury on roads

Lowering the road toll will take much more than altering road users' behaviour

In 2002 a theme issue of the BMJ focused on the unacceptable, and largely neglected, global toll of road traffic crashes.1 The subsequent report by the World Health Organization highlighted that low and middle income countries bear the brunt of this burden, accounting for more than 85% of the deaths and 90% of disability adjusted life years lost from road crashes.2 In contrast, many high income countries (including the United Kingdom) were shown to have sharply reduced their rates of road crashes in recent decades, exemplifying what could be achieved.

It is tempting to bask in the glory of such creditable achievements, but, as always, the devil is in the detail. A heterogeneous and unplanned collection of three papers appearing in this week's BMJ3-5 and one being published on line6 provides a timely reminder of the extent to which the potential to prevent road traffic injury remains a challenge, even in rich countries.

Examining 20 years of data up to 2001, Edwards and colleagues report a 63% decline in the rates of child deaths from injury in England and Wales.6 Below the surface of this heartening trend, however, are steep social class gradients indicating that the gains in life and health have largely eluded children from the poorest families. The authors calculate that 600 fewer children would have died from injury in 2001-3 if all children in England and Wales could aspire to the low death rate of the highest income group. These disparities were especially marked for deaths among child pedestrians and children on pedal cycles, with children in the lowest socioeconomic group experiencing cause specific mortality more than 20 times that of children in the highest group.

Similar disparities in child mortality are evident elsewhere, with important differences in the exposure to risk and the environmental risk factors found to underlie the apparent socioeconomic differentials. These include the speed and density of traffic in residential areas, access to safe play areas, and fenced driveways.7 8 Approaches to reduce these inequities must tackle economic and transport policy as well as interventions affecting the environment, vehicles, and road users, rather than relying solely on changing the behaviour of victims.

The study by Walker and colleagues provides little room for complacency regarding our ability to influence human behaviour.4 Although robust legislation was enacted more than 20 years ago, this study found that one in six drivers in London did not wear seatbelts.4 A worrying group also flouted highly publicised new legislation banning the use of hand held mobile phones while driving. The lack of an observed change in compliance during the transition from the grace period to penalty phase of implementing the law suggests a disturbing lack of awareness or disregard of the new legislation by these drivers. While the report focused on the more risky behaviour of drivers of four wheel drive vehicles, the behaviour of other drivers showed plenty of room for improvement.

Also in this issue, Nabi and colleagues draw attention to the strong association between sleepiness and the risk of road traffic crashes.5 French drivers reporting that they drove when sleepy once a month or more over 12 months had almost three times the risk of serious injury in the subsequent three years compared with those who did not drive when sleepy. While seat belts, speed, and alcohol consumption are emphasised in numerous road safety campaigns, sleepiness does not seem to have attained front line status. Yet strategies to prevent driving while acutely sleepy could prevent almost 20% of car crashes that cause serious injury.9 As noted by Nabi and colleagues, however, the main challenge may be to convince people to stop driving when they are sleepy rather than helping drivers to recognise their signs of sleepiness.

Regardless of the context, policy makers and planners require one or more yardsticks by which to measure the performance and celebrate the achievements of programmes designed to drive down the death toll and serious injury on the roads. With competing priorities, not to do so is programmatic suicide.

But, also in this week's BMJ, Gill and colleagues show the need to be circumspect when monitoring trends in non-fatal road traffic injury.3 First, their study confirms previous research suggesting that under-reporting of non-fatal injuries in police statistics is increasingly common, including injuries severe enough to warrant hospital admission.10 Secondly, for every death due to road traffic injury in England, there are about 20 admissions to hospital, indicating that the more reliable mortality statistics represent only the tip of the iceberg of road traffic injuries.

Finally, if robust indicators of serious non-fatal injury are difficult to find in high income countries, the degree of under-reporting is probably considerably greater in low and middle income countries, which experience a disproportionate burden of crashes.2 11 12 We have almost certainly underestimated considerably the global epidemic of road traffic injury.

Shanthi Ameratunga, director, Injury Prevention Research Centre

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
(s.ameratunga{at}auckland.ac.nz)

Rod Jackson, professor of epidemiology

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

Robyn Norton, professor of public health

University of Sydney, George Institute for International Health, PO Box M201, NSW 2050, Australia


Competing interests: None declared.

Research p 71, 73, 75

References

  1. Roberts I, Mohan D, Abbasi K. War on the roads. BMJ 2002;324: 1107-8.[Free Full Text]
  2. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder A, Jarawan E, et al (eds). World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
  3. Gill M, Goldacre M, Yeates D. Changes in safety on England's roads: analysis of hospital statistics. BMJ 2006;333: 73-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Walker L, Williams J, Jamrozik K. Unsafe driving behaviour and four wheel drive vehicles: observational study. BMJ 2006;333: 71-3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Nabi H, Guéguen A, Chiron M, Lafont S, Zins M, Lagarde E. Awareness of driving while sleepy and road traffic accidents: prospective study in GAZEL cohort. BMJ 2006;333: 75-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Edwards P, Green J, Roberts I, Lutchmun S. Deaths from injury in children and employment status in family: analysis of trends in class specific death rates. BMJ 2006;333: doi 10.1136/bmj.38875.757488.4F.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Roberts I, Norton R, Jackson R, Dunn R, Hassall I. Effect of environmental factors on risk of injury of child pedestrians by motor vehicles: a case-control study. BMJ 1995;310: 91-4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Roberts I, Norton R, Taua B. Child pedestrian injury rates: the importance of "exposure to risk" relating to socioeconomic and ethnic differences, in Auckland, New Zealand. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996;50: 162-5.[Abstract]
  9. Connor J, Norton R, Ameratunga SN, Robinson E, Civil I, Dunn R, et al. Driver sleepiness and the risk of serious car occupant injury: population based case-control study. BMJ 2002;324: 1125-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Langley J, Stephenson S, Cryer C. Measuring road traffic safety performance: monitoring trends in non-fatal injury. Traffic Inj Prev 2003;4: 291-6.[Medline]
  11. Nantulya V, Reich M. The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing countries. BMJ 2002;324: 1139-41.[Free Full Text]
  12. Ameratunga S, Hijar M, Norton R. Road traffic injuries: confronting disparities to address a global health problem. Lancet 2006;367: 1533-40.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Death on the roads: Should we advocate daytime running lights?
Richard G Henderson
BMJ 2006 333: 199-200. [Extract] [Full Text]

Unsafe driving behaviour and four wheel drive vehicles: observational study
Lesley Walker, Jonathan Williams, and Konrad Jamrozik
BMJ 2006 333: 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Awareness of driving while sleepy and road traffic accidents: prospective study in GAZEL cohort
Hermann Nabi, Alice Guéguen, Mireille Chiron, Sylviane Lafont, Marie Zins, and Emmanuel Lagarde
BMJ 2006 333: 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Changes in safety on England's roads: analysis of hospital statistics
Mike Gill, Michael J Goldacre, and David G R Yeates
BMJ 2006 333: 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

War on the roads
Ian Roberts, Dinesh Mohan, and Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2002 324: 1107-1108. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Driver sleepiness and risk of serious injury to car occupants: population based case control study
Jennie Connor, Robyn Norton, Shanthi Ameratunga, Elizabeth Robinson, Ian Civil, Roger Dunn, John Bailey, and Rod Jackson
BMJ 2002 324: 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing countries
Vinand M Nantulya and Michael R Reich
BMJ 2002 324: 1139-1141. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Effect of environmental factors on risk of injury of child pedestrians by motor vehicles: a case-control study
I Roberts, R Norton, R Jackson, R Dunn, and I Hassall
BMJ 1995 310: 91-94. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sethi, D., Racioppi, F., Bertollini, R. (2007). Preventing the leading cause of death in young people in Europe. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61: 842-843 [Full text]  
  • Duncan, R., Wyatt, J. (2006). Sophia. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 741-741 [Full text]  
  • (2006). Friends Don't Let Friends Drive While Sleepy. JWatch Emergency Med. 2006: 5-5 [Full text]  
  • Henderson, R. G (2006). Death on the roads: Should we advocate daytime running lights?. BMJ 333: 199-200 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

cars and horses
Irvine Stewart Lees Loudon
bmj.com, 8 Jul 2006 [Full text]
Popliteal aneurysms.
Andy Wood
bmj.com, 10 Jul 2006 [Full text]
Should we advocate daytime running lights?
Richard G. Henderson
bmj.com, 12 Jul 2006 [Full text]
Need of evidence based practices
Ediriweera Desapriya, et al.
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2006 [Full text]
Re: Should we advocate daytime running lights?
Dominic C Horne
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2006 [Full text]
Animal driven transportation still in vogue in many places
Biji T Kurien
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2006 [Full text]
Cars cause far more death by other means
Julie A White
bmj.com, 19 Jul 2006 [Full text]
Death on roads and solid organ procurement for transplantation
Alastair D Smith
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2006 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview