BMJ  2006;332 (22 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7547.0-d

Online cancer support groups can police themselves

Amid concerns about the quality of health information on the internet, most postings to an online breast cancer support group are accurate, and misleading postings are usually corrected by subsequent participants. Esquivel and colleagues (p 939) analysed the postings on an unmoderated email list for breast cancer patients and their families over four months in 2005. A mere 0.25% were misleading or false, and most were corrected by participants within four hours. The authors conclude that, given a sufficiently active forum, participants can identify and correct most false or misleading statements quickly and reliably without requiring professional review.


Figure 1
 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Accuracy and self correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list: content analysis
Adol Esquivel, Funda Meric-Bernstam, and Elmer V Bernstam
BMJ 2006 332: 939-942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview